atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Data

NeurIPS 2018 · Adversarial robustness and security › Certified and empirical robustness · approach: Robustness-accuracy trade-off analysis · 500 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Increase training data for robust rather than standard generalizationRobust classifiers · MNIST, CIFAR-10, and SVHNsamples required for a given test accuracyHelped
Train robustly on CIFAR10Wide residual network · CIFAR10 testadversarial accuracyHurt
Add explicit thresholding filters (ablation)MNIST convolutional network · MNISTadversarial test accuracyHelped
Add explicit thresholding filters (ablation)CIFAR10 convolutional network · CIFAR10adversarial accuracyNo clear effect
Use thresholding before a linear classifier (ablation)Bernoulli model classifier · Bernoulli modelrobust classification error: at most 1%Helped
Use a linear classifier with limited samplesBernoulli model · Bernoulli modelrobust classification error: at least 1/2 - γHurt
Use at most c_2 ε^2 √d / log d samplesAny learning algorithm · Gaussian modelrobust classification error: at least (1 - 1/d) 1/2Hurt

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy