atlas

Research map / Optimization / Optimizers

Reducing Reparameterization Gradient Variance

NeurIPS 2017 · Optimization › Optimizers · approach: Stochastic gradient MCMC · 34 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the HVP+Local control variate instead of the pure Monte Carlo estimatorMCVI with the frisk model · frisk, early, mid, and late optimization; L=3 and L=10gradient norm variance (% of MC): 100.000 -> 0.900; 100.000 -> 0.078; 100.000 -> 0.014; 1.037; 0.071; 0.022Helped
Replace the Hessian-vector product with a diagonal Hessian approximation (ablation)HVP+Local for MCVI on frisk · frisk, early, mid, and late optimization; L=3 and L=10gradient norm variance (% of MC): 22.090; 22.804; 38.725; 21.684; 21.260; 53.777Hurt
Use the exact full Hessian rather than the local approximation for the scale-gradient control variate (ablation)HVP+Local for MCVI on frisk · frisk, later optimizationlog-scale gradient variance: 98.523; 99.811 -> 1.686; 0.431Helped
Use HVP+Local rather than pure MC gradientsMCVI optimization on frisk · friskELBO convergence and stabilityHelped
Use HVP+Local rather than pure MC gradientsMCVI optimization on the Bayesian neural network · bnn, wineELBO versus wall-clock timeHelped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy