atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph self-supervised learning

Data-Augmented Curriculum Graph Neural Architecture Search under Distribution Shifts

AAAI 2024 · Graph learning › Graph self-supervised learning · approach: Graph domain adaptation · 17 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DCGAS, a graph NAS method for graph classification under distribution shifts that combines an embedding-guided discrete graph diffusion data generator with a two-factor uncertainty-based curriculum weighting strategy.

Problem

Graph neural architecture search for graph classification fails to generalize when training and test graph distributions shift, and existing methods ignore data augmentation and treat all training graphs equally.

Approach

Learns a graph-to-architecture mapping (architecture customizer over a differentiable supernet) trained on diffusion-generated graphs guided by graph embeddings, with per-graph loss weights derived from architecture-level and data-level uncertainty.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use DCGAS instead of GRACESGraph architecture search · Spurious-Motif (b = 0.7)accuracy: 65.72±17.47 -> 87.68±6.12Helped
Use DCGAS instead of GRACESGraph architecture search · Spurious-Motif (b = 0.8)accuracy: 59.57±17.37 -> 75.45±17.40Helped
Use DCGAS instead of GRACESGraph architecture search · Spurious-Motif (b = 0.9)accuracy: 50.94±8.14 -> 61.42±16.26Helped
Use DCGAS instead of GRACESGraph architecture search · OGBG-MolHIVROC-AUC: 77.31±1.00 -> 78.04±0.71Helped
Use DCGAS instead of GRACESGraph architecture search · OGBG-MolSIDERROC-AUC: 61.85±2.58 -> 63.46±1.42Helped
Use DCGAS instead of GRACESGraph architecture search · OGBG-MolBACEROC-AUC: 79.46±3.04 -> 81.31±1.94Helped
Add embedding-guided data generation and curriculum weighting (ablation)DCGAS · Spurious-Motif (b = 0.7)accuracy: 72.44±17.13 -> 87.68±6.12Helped
Add curriculum weighting (ablation)DCGAS with data generation · Spurious-Motif (b = 0.7)accuracy: 82.05±5.67 -> 87.68±6.12Helped
Add embedding-guided data generation (ablation)DCGAS with curriculum weighting · Spurious-Motif (b = 0.7)accuracy: 80.38±8.29 -> 87.68±6.12Helped
Add embedding-guided data generation and curriculum weighting (ablation)DCGAS · Spurious-Motif (b = 0.8)accuracy: 61.73±20.23 -> 75.45±17.40Helped
Add curriculum weighting (ablation)DCGAS with data generation · Spurious-Motif (b = 0.8)accuracy: 68.25±11.32 -> 75.45±17.40Helped
Add embedding-guided data generation (ablation)DCGAS with curriculum weighting · Spurious-Motif (b = 0.8)accuracy: 63.99±19.60 -> 75.45±17.40Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Spurious-Motif Ogbg-molhiv Ogbg-molbace Ogbg-molsider

Benchmarks: Spurious-Motif Ogbg-molhiv Ogbg-molbace Ogbg-molsider

Metrics: accuracy ROC-AUC

Baselines: GCN GAT GIN SAGE GraphConv MLP ASAP DIR Random search DARTS GNAS PAS

Builds on: DiGress GRACES DARTS DIR

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy