atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Submodular and game algorithms

Almost Envy-Free Allocations of Indivisible Goods or Chores with Entitlements

AAAI 2024 · Learning theory and algorithms › Submodular and game algorithms · approach: Fair division of indivisible goods · 7 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows WEFX and XWEF allocations of indivisible goods/chores with weighted agents may not exist for 2-3 agents, gives positive WEFX procedures for two agents (integer weights exact, normalized weights approximate) and a polynomial-time 1WEF chore algorithm.

Problem

Fair allocation of indivisible goods or chores to agents with unequal weights (entitlements), where standard EFX/EF1 notions are generalized to weighted envy-freeness.

Approach

Generalizes EFX and EF1 to weighted (entitlement-scaled) envy; proves impossibility counterexamples for 2 and 3 agents; adapts I-cut-you-choose for integer weights, a moving-knife procedure for normalized weights, and a weight-dependent round-robin picking sequence for chores yielding 1WEF.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use weighted envy-cycle elimination with identical additive valuationsGoods allocation · Goods, any number of agentsWEFX existenceHelped
Assume identical ordinal preferencesWeighted envy-cycle elimination · Goods, any number of agentsWEFX existenceHelped
Allow arbitrary additive valuations and unequal weightsGoods allocation · Goods, 2 agentsWEFX factor: 0.786Hurt
Allow arbitrary additive valuations and unequal weightsGoods allocation · Goods, 3 agentsWEFX factor: 0.795Hurt
Use integer-valued weights and the modified I-cut-you-choose procedureGoods allocation · Goods, 2 agentsWEFX existenceHelped
Use normalized weights and the moving-knife-based procedureGoods allocation · Goods, 2 agentsapproximate WEFX factor: \frac{w}{2\sqrt[3]{m}}Helped
Allow arbitrary additive cost functions and unequal weightsChores allocation · Chores, 2 agentsXWEF factor: 1.272Hurt
Allow arbitrary additive cost functions and unequal weightsChores allocation · Chores, 3 agentsXWEF factor: 1.214Hurt
Use a weight-dependent picking sequence and final allocation loopChore-Division Round-Robin · Chores, any number of agents1WEF existenceHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Baselines: WEF1 algorithm (Chakraborty et al.) weighted MMS envy-cycle elimination

Builds on: envy-cycle elimination I-cut-you-choose moving-knife procedure weighted EF1 algorithm

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy