atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Causal discovery

Balancing Interference and Correlation in Spatial Experimental Designs: A Causal Graph Cut Approach

ICML 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Causal discovery · approach: Latent-variable causal estimation

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a causal graph cut algorithm that designs cluster-randomized spatial experiments by minimizing a surrogate of the DR estimator's MSE, solved with spectral graph cuts under spatial interference and correlation.

Problem

Designing spatial A/B experiments under spatial interference and outcome correlation to minimize the MSE of the average treatment effect estimator, which is NP-hard combinatorially.

Approach

A surrogate for the DR estimator's MSE that trades off an interference term (upper-bounded without cluster boundaries) against within-cluster residual correlation, so that the design reduces to a graph cut solvable by spectral clustering, adapting to the estimated covariance rather than using a minimax worst case.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use causal graph cut instead of benchmark approachesATE estimation in the ridesharing simulator · Real-data-based simulatorMSE: 3.5 times lowerHelped
Use CGC instead of the global designATE estimation · Synthetic environmentsrelative MSE: 54%Helped
Use CGC instead of the individual designATE estimation · Synthetic environmentsrelative MSE: 72%Helped
Use CGC rather than the global designATE estimation · Real-data-based simulatorMSEHelped
Use CGC rather than the individual designATE estimation · Real-data-based simulatorMSEHelped
Use estimated covariance through the iterative framework instead of known covariance (ablation)CGC · Synthetic environmentsMSENo clear effect
Fit outcome regression using pooled data across regions with longitude and latitude, rather than fitting each region separately (ablation)CGC and OCGC · Synthetic environmentsMSEHelped
Use all collected datasets to refit the model rather than only the latest dataset (ablation)CGC · Square spatial settingMSEHelped
Use a noised covariance matrix instead of the true covariance matrix (ablation)OCGC · Single-experiment settingsMSENo clear effect
Omit cross-fitting (ablation)CGC · Synthetic and real-data-based experimentsMSENo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: five-day historical ridesharing dataset (about 1 million observations for ML models) synthetic spatial grids

Benchmarks: synthetic spatial environments (square, rectangle, circle, fans) real-data-based ridesharing simulator (R=85 hexagonal regions)

Metrics: relative MSE of ATE estimator

Baselines: spectral clustering threeNet causal clustering global design individual design OCGC

Builds on: causal clustering doubly robust estimator for interference (Zhu et al.) spectral clustering cross-fitting

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy