atlas

Research map / Optimization / Implicit bias and generalization

Simplicity Bias and Optimization Threshold in Two-Layer ReLU Networks

ICML 2025 · Optimization › Implicit bias and generalization · approach: Shallow ReLU network convergence · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows theoretically that small-initialized overparametrized two-layer ReLU networks trained by gradient flow, on linear data with many samples (n ≳ d^3 log d), converge to a non-interpolating spurious stationary point approximating OLS, via early alignment and an optimization threshold.

Problem

Overparametrized neural networks trained with gradient descent may fail to interpolate training data for large sample sizes; the paper asks why and whether this non-interpolation yields simplicity bias and better test loss.

Approach

Early alignment of neurons toward extremal vectors of a function G_n whose gradient concentrates to the true-loss gradient D(w) as n grows; for linear teachers with two extremal directions, the network converges to the difference of two ReLU neurons equal to the OLS estimators on positive and negative data halves, giving an optimization threshold beyond which interpolation does not occur.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
increase the training sample size beyond the optimization thresholdTwo-layer ReLU network on the linear teacher · Linear teacher, d=5test loss: 3000Helped
increase the training sample size from n=500 to n=5 000Two-layer ReLU network on the linear teacher · Linear teacherneurons aligned with OLS: 69% -> 91%Helped
replace ReLU activation with GeLU (ablation)Two-layer network on the linear teacher · Linear teacher, n=500interpolationHurt
replace ReLU with GeLU and SGD with Adam (ablation)Two-layer network on the linear teacher · Linear teacher, varying training sample sizefinal train and test loss behaviorNo clear effect
continue training from the converged point using a decaying learning rate (ablation)Two-layer ReLU network on the linear teacher · Linear teacher, n=8 000training loss: 0.082 -> slightly more than 0.0815No clear effect
reduce the learning rate to 0.001 (ablation)Two-layer ReLU network on the linear teacher · Linear teacher, n=8 000convergence to OLS: 0.001No clear effect
increase dimension from d=5 to d=10 (ablation)Two-layer ReLU network on the linear teacher · Linear teachersample size where interpolation stops: d=10; n=10\ 000Hurt
replace the linear teacher with a 5 ReLU teacher (ablation)Two-layer ReLU network · 5 ReLU teachersample size needed for train and test loss to approach noise variance: around n=2000; around n*=17000Hurt
increase the training sample size (ablation)Two-layer ReLU network on the 5 ReLU teacher · 5 ReLU teachertest loss: around n*=17000Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: synthetic linear regression data

Benchmarks: synthetic linear regression

Metrics: train loss test loss cosine similarity with OLS estimator

Baselines: ordinary least squares interpolating global minimum

Builds on: early alignment analysis of small-initialized two-layer networks Clarke subdifferential gradient flow

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy