atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Knowledge distillation

When Data-Free Knowledge Distillation Meets Non-Transferable Teacher: Escaping Out-of-Distribution Trap is All You Need

ICML 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Knowledge distillation · approach: Self and data-free distillation · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Investigates distilling non-transferable learning (NTL) teachers via data-free KD, finds an "OOD trap" that degrades ID knowledge transfer, and proposes ATEsc, which splits synthetic samples by adversarial robustness and distills only fragile (ID-like) samples while pushing away robust (OOD-like) ones.

Problem

Data-free knowledge distillation assumes trustworthy teachers; when the teacher is an NTL model that restricts transferability from an ID domain to an OOD domain, synthetic data drift toward OOD and the student learns misleading OOD knowledge while losing ID accuracy.

Approach

NTL teachers are more adversarially robust on OOD samples than ID samples, so PGD-based robustness can separate synthetic samples into ID-like (fragile) and OOD-like (robust) groups; distill only on fragile samples and use a KL-maximization forgetting term on robust samples.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add ATEsc to NAYERNAYER · SVHN → MNIST-M, close-set; VGG-13 → VGG-11IAcc: 7.2 ± 0.3 -> 86.1 ± 1.8Helped
Add ATEsc to NAYERNAYER · SVHN → MNIST-M, close-set; VGG-13 → VGG-11OAcc: 10.6 ± 0.3 -> 33.7 ± 3.6Helped
Add ATEsc to NAYERNAYER · SVHN → CIFAR10, open-set; VGG-13 → VGG-11IAcc: 6.4 ± 0.0 -> 89.2 ± 1.6Helped
Add ATEsc to NAYERNAYER · SVHN → CIFAR10, open-set; VGG-13 → VGG-11OLAcc: 100.0 ± 0.0 -> 0.0 ± 0.0Helped
Add ATEsc to NAYERNAYER · BadNet(sq), NTL-based backdoor; VGG-13 → VGG-11ASR: 100.0 ± 0.0 -> 34.6 ± 47.3Helped
Remove BN loss from CMI (ablation)CMI · CIFAR10 → STL; ResNet-34 → ResNet-18IAcc: 37.7 ± 3.5 -> 31.1 ± 3.2Hurt
Remove BN loss from NAYER (ablation)NAYER · CIFAR10 → Digits; ResNet-34 → ResNet-18IAcc: 49.4 ± 2.6 -> 39.1 ± 3.5Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: SVHN MNIST-M CIFAR10 STL10 Digits (MNIST, USPS, SVHN, MNIST-M, SYN-D)

Benchmarks: SVHN->MNIST-M CIFAR10->STL10 SVHN->CIFAR10 CIFAR10->Digits CIFAR10 NTL backdoor (BadNets, Blended, Sig)

Metrics: ID accuracy (IAcc) OOD accuracy (OAcc) OOD-label accuracy (OLAcc) attack success rate (ASR)

Baselines: ZSKT DFQ CMI NAYER ABD

Builds on: non-transferable learning ZSKT DFQ CMI NAYER

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy