atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Pruning and efficient tuning

Fast and Low-Cost Genomic Foundation Models via Outlier Removal

ICML 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › Pruning and efficient tuning · approach: Low-rank compression and merging

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes GERM, a DNABERT-2-style genomic foundation model whose attention is replaced by an outlier-free Softmax1 (Hopfield-inspired) layer, plus GERM-T, a small-step continual-learning variant that converts existing checkpoints to reduce outliers and improve quantization and LoRA adaptation.

Problem

Genomic foundation models such as DNABERT-2 are costly to adapt and degrade badly under low-rank adaptation and post-training quantization because of attention outliers, and retraining outlier-free models from scratch is expensive.

Approach

Replace the vanilla softmax attention with an outlier-free Softmax_1 (associative-memory / Hopfield-derived) layer during pretraining and fine-tuning, and reduce outliers in existing checkpoints via small-step continual learning with the outlier-free structure.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace vanilla softmax attention with outlier-free Softmax_1 (GERM)DNABERT-2 · GUE PTQ and LoRAMCC / avg performance drop: LoRA drop 13.87% -> 4.12%; W4A4 OmniQuant drop 94.78% -> 17.17%Helped
Replace vanilla softmax attention with outlier-free Softmax_1 (GERM)DNABERT-2 · GUE pretrained model outlier metricsavg kurtosis / max inf norm: avg kurtosis 270.90 -> 21.29; max inf norm 61.64 -> 10.62Helped
Small-step continual learning (40K steps) with outlier-free attention (GERM-T)DNABERT-2 · GUE PTQ 6W/6A Outlier Suppression and LoRAavg performance drop: LoRA drop 13.87% -> 6.23%; max inf norm 61.41 -> 28.49 (full)Helped
Longer continual learning (100K steps) vs 40K for GERM-T (ablation)GERM-T outlier-free continual learning · GUE PTQ 8W/8A SmoothQuantavg performance drop: 2.96% vs 3.00% (GERM-T 40K)No clear effect
Continual learning steps 20K vs 40K/100K (ablation)GERM-T · GUE LoRAavg performance drop: Out20k 7.53% vs GERM-T 6.24% vs Out100k 6.52% (LoRA)Mixed
Outlier-free attention with LoRA rank 8 vs vanilla (ablation)DNABERT-2 / GERM · GUE LoRA rank ablationMCC: 52.87 -> 57.27 MCCHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: GUE benchmark (27 datasets, 7 tasks, 4 species) Nucleotide Transformer benchmark

Benchmarks: GUE Nucleotide Transformer benchmark

Metrics: MCC average performance drop average kurtosis maximum infinity norm

Baselines: DNABERT-2 SmoothQuant Outlier Suppression OmniQuant LoRA QLoRA LoftQ clipped softmax gated attention

Builds on: DNABERT-2 Outlier-efficient Hopfield layers (OutEffHop) LoRA SmoothQuant OmniQuant

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy