atlas

Research map / Time series / Long-term forecasting

Hi-Patch: Hierarchical Patch GNN for Irregular Multivariate Time Series

ICML 2025 · Time series › Long-term forecasting · approach: Graph-based multivariate forecasting

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Hi-Patch, a hierarchical patch graph network that models irregular multivariate time series at multiple scales via intra-patch and inter-patch GNN layers, evaluated on IMTS forecasting and classification across 8 datasets.

Problem

Multi-scale modeling of irregular multivariate time series (IMTS), where variables have distinct original sampling rates and asynchronous observations, which existing downsampling/segmentation-based multi-scale methods cannot handle.

Approach

Encode each observation as a graph node, build fully connected intra-patch graphs for densely sampled variables, aggregate nodes into patch-level nodes, and stack inter-patch graph layers that progressively merge patches (P, 2P, 4P, ...) so that scale-specific GAT updates capture fine-to-coarse temporal and inter-variable dependencies without interpolation.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use hierarchical multi-scale architecture rather than extracting only original-scale features (ablation)Hi-Patch · Human ActivityMSE×10−3: 2.70 ± 0.04 -> 2.57 ± 0.02Helped
use hierarchical multi-scale architecture rather than extracting only original-scale features (ablation)Hi-Patch · USHCNMSE×10−1: 5.35 ± 0.13 -> 4.94 ± 0.05Helped
retain asynchronous edges between different variables at different times (ablation)Hi-Patch · Human ActivityMSE×10−3: 2.68 ± 0.04 -> 2.57 ± 0.02Helped
retain asynchronous edges between different variables at different times (ablation)Hi-Patch · USHCNMSE×10−1: 5.21 ± 0.03 -> 4.94 ± 0.05Helped
use separate attention parameter sets for the three edge types (ablation)Hi-Patch · Human ActivityMSE×10−3: 2.60 ± 0.01 -> 2.57 ± 0.02No clear effect
use separate attention parameter sets for the three edge types (ablation)Hi-Patch · USHCNMSE×10−1: 4.99 ± 0.03 -> 4.94 ± 0.05Helped
aggregate nodes with multi-time attention instead of mean aggregation (ablation)Hi-Patch · Human ActivityMSE×10−3: 2.77 ± 0.02 -> 2.57 ± 0.02Helped
aggregate nodes with multi-time attention instead of mean aggregation (ablation)Hi-Patch · USHCNMSE×10−1: 5.23 ± 0.04 -> 4.94 ± 0.05Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: PhysioNet MIMIC-III Human Activity USHCN P19 P12

Benchmarks: PhysioNet MIMIC-III Human Activity USHCN P19 P12

Metrics: MSE MAE AUROC AUPRC

Baselines: iTransformer ModernTCN TimesNet PatchTST Pathformer TimeMixer MSGNet Warpformer tPatchGNN GraFITi

Builds on: tPatchGNN mTAND Warpformer graph attention network PatchTST

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy