atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Matrix and tensor methods

Low-Rank Thinning

ICML 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Matrix and tensor methods · approach: Structured low-rank learning · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Gives a low-rank analysis of sub-Gaussian thinning that bounds kernel MMD and kernel max seminorm by sub-Gaussian constant and kernel/data rank, then applies it to attention approximation (Thinformer), SGD reordering (KH-SGD), and near-linear-time deep kernel two-sample testing (CTT).

Problem

Existing sub-Gaussian thinning guarantees cover only restricted distributions and kernel-based quality measures and have pessimistic dimension dependence, leaving thinning quality unclear for approximately low-rank data or kernels.

Approach

A low-rank analysis shows that any sub-Gaussian thinning algorithm's MMD and kernel max seminorm are controlled by its sub-Gaussian constant times an approximate rank (eigenvalue tail or data rank), applying to any kernel and distribution; this is used to design Thinformer, KH-SGD reordering, and deep-kernel CTT.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace exact attention with ThinformerT2T-ViT · ImageNet 2012 validationTop-1 accuracy (%): 82.55 ± 0.00 -> 82.18 ± 0.05Hurt
Replace Performer attention with ThinformerT2T-ViT · ImageNet 2012 validationTop-1 accuracy (%): 80.56 ± 0.30 -> 82.18 ± 0.05Helped
Replace Performer attention with ThinformerT2T-ViT · ImageNet 2012 validationLayer 1 runtime (ms): 2.54 ± 0.01 -> 2.06 ± 0.01Helped
Replace Performer attention with ThinformerT2T-ViT · ImageNet 2012 validationLayer 2 runtime (ms): 0.60 ± 0.01 -> 0.54 ± 0.00Helped
Replace KDEformer attention with ThinformerBigGAN · ImageNet validationFID: 30.70 -> 30.54Helped
Replace KDEformer attention with ThinformerBigGAN · ImageNet validationInception Score: 56.91 ± 4.16 -> 57.12 ± 3.96No clear effect
Replace exact attention with ThinformerBigGAN · ImageNet validationRuntime (ms): 5.79 ± 0.02 -> 2.69 ± 0.01Helped
Replace Performer attention with ThinformerBigGAN · ImageNet validationRuntime (ms): 2.29 ± 0.01 -> 2.69 ± 0.01Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ImageNet Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Higgs

Benchmarks: ImageNet FID on ImageNet validation Higgs

Metrics: top-1 accuracy runtime FID Inception Score MMD detectable separation rate power

Baselines: Performer Reformer ScatterBrain KDEformer HyperAttention random reshuffling CD-GraB W-Block

Builds on: Kernel Halving Compress Compress Then Test Gram-Schmidt walk CD-GraB

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy