atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Mixture of experts

QoS-Efficient Serving of Multiple Mixture-of-Expert LLMs Using Partial Runtime Reconfiguration

ICML 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › Mixture of experts · approach: Efficient MoE language model systems · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a single-GPU multi-tenant serving system for fine-tuned MoE LLMs that consolidates similar experts across models and partially reconfigures non-expert layers per request, cutting turnaround time versus NVIDIA MIG.

Problem

Serving multiple fine-tuned mixture-of-experts LLMs on one memory-constrained GPU is inefficient: time sharing incurs minutes-long model swaps, and NVIDIA MIG splits PCIe bandwidth and compute, raising latency.

Approach

Similarity-based expert consolidation builds one shared expert map across models by ranking per-(layer, expert) L2 distances and assigning experts round-robin, while the non-expert layers are swapped on the GPU at runtime to match the requested model.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Serve multiple Mixtral models using similarity-based expert consolidation and runtime partial reconfiguration instead of NVIDIA MIGProposed multi-model serving system · Average requestTurnaround time (seconds): 49.67 -> 8.78Helped
Use runtime partial reconfiguration to serve multiple models instead of serving one modelMixtral-8x7B serving · Average requestTTFT (seconds): 0.89 -> 1.41Hurt
Use runtime partial reconfiguration to serve multiple models instead of serving one modelMixtral-8x7B serving · Average requestTurnaround time (seconds): 8.34 -> 8.78Hurt
Apply similarity-based expert consolidation and runtime partial reconfiguration rather than weight averagingMixtral-8x7B · WikiText2perplexity: 3.89 -> 3.85Helped
Apply similarity-based expert consolidation and runtime partial reconfiguration rather than weight averagingMixtral-8x7B · C4perplexity: 7.38 -> 7.33Helped
Apply similarity-based expert consolidation and runtime partial reconfiguration rather than weight averagingMixtral-8x7B · PTBperplexity: 13.44 -> 13.90Hurt
Apply similarity-based expert consolidation and runtime partial reconfiguration rather than weight averagingMixtral-8x7B · MT-BenchAvg score: 7.99 -> 8.16Helped
Use expert consolidation and runtime partial reconfiguration rather than weight averagingMixtral-8x7B · TruthfulQA (5-shot)accuracy: 73.0% -> 70.6%Hurt
Increase the number of served variants from A & B to A, B, C, and DProposed Switch Transformer serving · SAMSumROUGE-1: 0.491 -> 0.463Mixed
Increase the number of merged variants from A & B to A, B, C, and DAveraging baseline · SAMSumROUGE-1: 0.422 -> 0.256Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: WikiText2 PTB C4 MT-Bench MMLU HellaSwag TruthfulQA SAMSum

Benchmarks: WikiText2 PTB C4 MT-Bench MMLU HellaSwag TruthfulQA SAMSum

Metrics: perplexity MT-Bench score accuracy ROUGE TTFT turnaround time throughput

Baselines: NVIDIA MIG single model serving Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1-avg Averaging merge (Switch Transformer)

Builds on: Mixtral Switch Transformer model averaging NVIDIA MIG

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy