atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph self-supervised learning

Enhancing Graph Contrastive Learning for Protein Graphs from Perspective of Invariance

ICML 2025 · Graph learning › Graph self-supervised learning · approach: Graph contrastive learning analysis

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes biology-aware graph augmentations for protein GCL: FCI (spectral, chemically weighted 2D edge sampling) and 3-PSI (dihedral-angle and secondary-structure rotations in 3D), combined in a GCN-based framework evaluated on four protein tasks.

Problem

Existing graph contrastive learning for protein representation learning uses 2D topology-only augmentations that ignore biological properties, while 3D structure-based protein graph augmentation is unexplored and traditional 3D perturbations or homology-model augmentations distort or reduce diversit

Approach

Augmentations guided by protein invariances: FCI preserves functional communities via spectral bounds with side-chain chemical similarity as edge weights, and 3-PSI perturbs backbone dihedral angles and rotates secondary structures to keep peptide planes and helices/sheets intact.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add FCI to the protein GCL framework (ablation)proposed protein GCL · ECFmax: 0.853 -> 0.878Helped
add 3-PSIDiag to the protein GCL framework (ablation)proposed protein GCL · ECFmax: 0.853 -> 0.873Helped
add 3-PSIAlpha to the protein GCL framework (ablation)proposed protein GCL · ECFmax: 0.853 -> 0.874Helped
add 3-PSIDiag and FCI (ablation)proposed protein GCL · ECFmax: 0.853 -> 0.883Helped
add 3-PSIAlpha and FCI (ablation)proposed protein GCL · ECFmax: 0.853 -> 0.885Helped
use FCI instead of the strongest listed 2D topology-based GCL baselineprotein GCL · GO-CCFmax: 0.440 -> 0.446Helped
use 3-PSIDiag instead of traditional 3D augmentationprotein GCL · GO-CCFmax: 0.432 -> 0.449Helped
combine 3-PSIAlpha and FCI instead of CDConvprotein representation learning · Reactionaccuracy: 88.6 -> 89.0Helped
increase α-helix and β-sheet rotations from 1 to 23-PSIAlpha · FOLD and GO-BPaccuracy / FmaxMixed
increase α-helix and β-sheet rotations from 1 to 33-PSIAlpha · Reaction and GO-CCaccuracy / FmaxMixed
set loss weight λ to 1.0proposed method · ECFmax: 0.882 -> 0.885Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Protein Fold classification (FOLD) Enzyme Reaction classification Gene Ontology (GO) BP/MF/CC Enzyme Commission (EC) PDBbind

Benchmarks: FOLD Reaction GO EC PDBbind

Metrics: accuracy Fmax RMSE Pearson Spearman

Baselines: GVP 3DCNN GraphQA IEConv GearNet-Edge-IEConv ProNet CDConv GraphCL Auto-GCL MolCLR T-MGCL GCL-Span

Builds on: GraphCL CDConv ProNet CI-GCL GraphTrans

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy