atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Uncertainty and Gaussian processes

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential Regression

AAAI 2023 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Uncertainty and Gaussian processes · approach: Epistemic versus aleatoric decomposition · 37 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Normalize residuals by the predicted t-distribution width in the regularizerDER · Binary Pulseuncertainty estimation qualityHelped
Replace the original epistemic uncertainty proxy with the redefined proxy 1/sqrt(nu)DER · NYU Depth v2epistemic uncertainty separationHurt
Use the t-distribution width as the uncertainty proxyDER · NYU Depth v2separation of aleatoric and epistemic uncertaintyHurt
Normalize residuals by the predicted t-distribution width in the regularizer (ablation)DER · Synthetic cubic regressionuncertainty predictionNo clear effect
Replace the t-distribution likelihood with a normal likelihood (ablation)DER · Synthetic cubic regressionsample varianceHurt
Set lambda to 0 and use the normal-distribution standard deviation as an uncertainty proxy (ablation)DER depth estimation · NYU Depth v2separation of in-distribution and out-of-distribution dataHelped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy