atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Neural architecture search

Revisiting Neural Networks for Few-Shot Learning: A Zero-Cost NAS Perspective

ICML 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › Neural architecture search · approach: One-shot and few-shot supernets

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes IBFS, a training-free zero-cost NAS method that ranks architectures for few-shot learning using an information-bottleneck-inspired entropy proxy over Jacobian eigenvalues, and finds meta-architectures for MAML/Reptile-style FSL without training.

Problem

Neural architecture search for few-shot learning is either expensive (searching from scratch or meta-learning NAS costing 100+ GPU days) or reuses architectures from other tasks, which can be sub-optimal.

Approach

Derives that MAML's global convergence can be guaranteed by considering only the first-order (inner-loss) landscape, then scores untrained architectures with an entropy-based information-bottleneck proxy computed from eigenvalues of a batch Jacobian matrix, so architecture ranking needs no training.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use IBFS instead of IS-DARTSNAS-Bench-201 · CIFAR-10 testaccuracy: 94.36±0.00 -> 94.37 ± 0.34Helped
Use IBFS instead of IS-DARTSNAS-Bench-201 · CIFAR-100 testaccuracy: 73.31±0.00 -> 73.09 ± 2.08Hurt
Use IBFS instead of IS-DARTSNAS-Bench-201 · ImageNet-16-120 testaccuracy: 46.34±0.00 -> 46.33 ± 1.27Hurt
Use IBFS(C10) instead of WeakNASDARTS search space · ImageNet1kTop-1 accuracy: 76.5 -> 76.7 ↑(0.2)Helped
Use IBFS instead of MetaDifffew-shot classifier · mini-ImageNet 5-way 1-shotaccuracy: 64.99±0.77 -> 64.55±0.02Hurt
Use IBFS instead of MetaDifffew-shot classifier · mini-ImageNet 5-way 5-shotaccuracy: 81.21 ±0.56 -> 81.52±0.08Helped
Use IBFS instead of MetaDifffew-shot classifier · tiered-ImageNet 5-way 1-shotaccuracy: 72.33±0.92 -> 72.56±0.02Helped
Use IBFS instead of MetaNAS (retrained)few-shot classifier · tiered-ImageNet 5-way 5-shotaccuracy: 86.48±0.06 -> 86.73±0.08Helped
Use IBFS(C10) instead of Auto-ProxImageNet architecture search · ImageNet (AutoFormer benchmark)Top-1 accuracy: 75.6 -> 76.5Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: NAS-Bench-201 CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 ImageNet-16-120 mini-ImageNet tiered-ImageNet ImageNet1k

Benchmarks: NAS-Bench-201 DARTS search space ImageNet1k mini-ImageNet 5-way 1/5-shot tiered-ImageNet 5-way 1/5-shot AutoFormer benchmark ImageNet

Metrics: top-1 accuracy Kendall's Tau search cost (s/GPU-days/hr) few-shot accuracy

Baselines: MAML ANIL MetaOptNet RFS AutoMeta MetaNAS MetaNTK-NAS MetaDiff NASWOT SWAP TENAS NASI-ADA

Builds on: MAML Reptile NASWOT MetaNTK-NAS TENAS

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy