atlas

Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability

Towards Global-level Mechanistic Interpretability: A Perspective of Modular Circuits of Large Language Models

ICML 2025 · Large language models › Language, safety and interpretability · approach: Reasoning mechanisms and failure modes

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes ModCirc, a framework that discovers a task-agnostic vocabulary of modular circuits (MCs) in LLMs via reusable subgraph extraction, RL-based GNN graph partitioning, and LLM-generated functional interpretations.

Problem

Existing mechanistic interpretability finds circuits task by task, which generalizes poorly across tasks and is costly because each circuit node needs a human or GPT-4 functional interpretation.

Approach

Define five criteria (consistency, locality, reusability, composability, globality) for a modular circuit vocabulary, then discover reusable subgraphs across task circuits, partition them with a policy-gradient-trained GNN, and assign cached functional interpretations so new tasks can reuse them.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use ModCirc instead of the strongest listed baselineModCirc · Coreferencereusability: 0.21 ± 0.01 -> 0.37 ± 0.01Helped
use ModCirc instead of the strongest listed baselineModCirc · MedAttrreusability: 0.18 ± 0.01 -> 0.34 ± 0.01Helped
use ModCirc instead of the strongest listed baselineModCirc · MedStatusreusability: 0.17 ± 0.01 -> 0.33 ± 0.00Helped
use ModCirc instead of the strongest listed baselineModCirc · PubMed Summ.reusability: 0.18 ± 0.01 -> 0.32 ± 0.01Helped
use ModCirc rather than the strongest listed baselineModCirc · Coreferenceconsistency: 0.39 ± 0.02 -> 0.40 ± 0.02Helped
use ModCirc rather than the strongest listed baselineModCirc · MedAttrconsistency: 0.34 ± 0.01 -> 0.33 ± 0.01Hurt
use ModCirc rather than the strongest listed baselineModCirc · MedStatusconsistency: 0.26 ± 0.00 -> 0.26 ± 0.01No clear effect
use ModCirc rather than the strongest listed baselineModCirc · PubMed Summ.consistency: 0.34 ± 0.01 -> 0.34 ± 0.03No clear effect
use ModCirc rather than the strongest listed baselineModCirc · Coreferencecomposability: 0.80 ± 0.10 -> 0.70 ± 0.10Hurt
use ModCirc rather than the strongest listed baselineModCirc · MedAttrcomposability: 1.00 ± 0.00 -> 0.95 ± 0.10Hurt
use ModCirc rather than the strongest listed baselineModCirc · MedStatuscomposability: 1.00 ± 0.00No clear effect
use ModCirc rather than the strongest listed baselineModCirc · PubMed Summ.composability: 0.75 ± 0.00 -> 0.70 ± 0.10Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MEDAL Medical Abstracts MedMCQA Symptom to Diagnosis AGNews MPQA Universal Dependency TREC

Benchmarks: MedStatus MedAttr Coreference PubMed Summ. IOI acronym detection

Metrics: composability consistency reusability recovery rate of ground-truth circuit components

Baselines: Random Frequent Random KMeans Activation-based grouping

Builds on: activation patching edge attribute patching integrated gradients REINFORCE Nanda modularity hypothesis

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy