atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Domain adaptation and generalization

Merge-Friendly Post-Training Quantization for Multi-Target Domain Adaptation

ICML 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Domain adaptation and generalization · approach: Conditional distribution alignment · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes HDRQ, a post-training quantization method that uses noise-based Hessian regularization, weight-distance regularization, and noise-sampling rounding so quantized domain-adapted models can be merged for multi-target domain adaptation.

Problem

Quantizing target-adapted models degrades their weight-space merging for multi-target domain adaptation, because quantization noise and discretization create error barriers between models.

Approach

Analyzes quantization's effect on merging via error barriers, then combines noise-injection training (flattening the Hessian), a penalty on distance between domain-adapted weights and the source weight, and noise-sampled merging with cosine-similarity selection to produce merge-friendly PTQ.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use HDRQ instead of QDrop quantization before mergingGTA→Cityscapes + Indian Driving, W6A6 · GTA→Cityscapes + Indian Driving, W6A6 mergedmIoU harmonic mean: +1.19 mIoUHelped
Use HDRQ instead of QDrop quantization before mergingGTA→Cityscapes + Indian Driving, W4A4 · GTA→Cityscapes + Indian Driving, W4A4 mergedmIoU harmonic mean: +4.21 mIoUHelped
Use HDRQ instead of QDrop quantization before mergingOffice-Home · Office-Home, R→A,C,P, W3A3 mergedharmonic mean accuracy: 62.99 -> 64.70Helped
Use HDRQ instead of QDrop quantization before mergingOffice-Home · Office-Home, P→R,A,C, W3A3 mergedharmonic mean accuracy: 61.24 -> 61.55Helped
Add noise-based quantization to the QDrop baseline (ablation)HDRQ · Office-Home, R→A,C,P, W3A3 mergedaccuracy: 62.99 -> 64.21; 1.22%Helped
Add distance regularization to noise-based quantization (ablation)HDRQ · Office-Home, R→A,C,P, W3A3 mergedaccuracy: 64.21 -> 64.70; 0.49%Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: GTA Cityscapes Indian Driving Dataset Office-Home

Benchmarks: Cityscapes Indian Driving Dataset Office-Home

Metrics: mIoU accuracy harmonic mean

Baselines: BRECQ QDrop

Builds on: QDrop BRECQ HRDA SHOT error barrier analysis

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy