atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Sample complexity

Improved Sample Complexity for Private Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization

ICML 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Sample complexity · approach: Private and query-efficient algorithms · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Gives improved differentially private sample complexity for finding Goldstein-stationary points of nonsmooth nonconvex objectives via a single-pass zero-order method with sensitivity-reduced gradient estimators, plus a multi-pass ERM method and an ERM-to-population generalization result.

Problem

Differentially private optimization of stochastic or empirical objectives that are neither smooth nor convex, targeting (alpha,beta)-Goldstein-stationary points with lower sample complexity.

Approach

Reduce gradient-estimator sensitivity with high probability via sub-Gaussian concentration (large number of random directions m), so that the minibatch sensitivity drops by a factor of d, combined with randomized smoothing, O2NC, and the tree mechanism in a single-pass scheme; a multi-pass ERM variant plus a new ERM-to-population Goldstein-stationarity generalization bound.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace the previous single-pass method with the proposed single-pass algorithmPrivate nonsmooth nonconvex optimization · Stochastic NSNC optimizationsample complexity: \frac{d}{\alpha\beta^3}+\frac{d^{3/2}}{\varepsilon\alpha\beta^2} -> \frac{\sqrt{d}}{\alpha\beta^3}+\frac{d}{\varepsilon\Helped
Use a multi-pass private ERM algorithmPrivate nonsmooth nonconvex optimization · Empirical NSNC optimizationsample complexity: \frac{d^{3/4}}{\varepsilon\alpha^{1/2}\beta^{3/2}}Helped
Generalize the multi-pass ERM guarantee from empirical to population lossProposed multi-pass algorithm · Stochastic NSNC optimizationsample complexity: +\frac{d}{\beta^2}Mixed
Use a first-order gradient oracle instead of a zero-order oracleProposed single-pass algorithm · Stochastic NSNC optimizationsample complexityNo clear effect
Use a first-order gradient oracle instead of a zero-order oracleProposed single-pass algorithm · Stochastic NSNC optimizationoracle calls: \widetilde{\Omega}(d^2) times lessHelped
Use Lasry-Lions smoothing and component-wise Goldstein-stationarityPrivate empirical NSNC optimization · Empirical NSNC optimizationsample complexity: \widetilde{\Omega}\left(\frac{R^{1/3}L^{4/3}d^{2/3}}{\varepsilon\alpha^{1/3}\beta}\right)Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: sample complexity

Baselines: Zhang et al. 2024 single-pass zero-order DP algorithm

Builds on: O2NC randomized smoothing tree mechanism Goldstein stationarity

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy