atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Differential equations and PDEs

Latent Mamba Operator for Partial Differential Equations

ICML 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Differential equations and PDEs · approach: Neural operators for general geometries · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes LaMO, a latent-space bidirectional state-space-model neural operator for PDEs that is theoretically linked to kernel integral operators and reports large error reductions on Darcy, Navier-Stokes, Plasticity, Airfoil, Pipe and Elasticity benchmarks.

Problem

Existing neural operators for PDEs struggle with scalability to high-dimensional and high-resolution domains, high computational cost (quadratic attention), and capturing continuous long-range dependencies in PDE dynamics.

Approach

Compress physical tokens into a small set of adaptive latent tokens (softmax-weighted, Perceiver-style) and apply bidirectional Mamba-style selective SSM blocks in latent space, with a theorem that the latent SSM acts as a learnable kernel integral.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
replace Transolver with LaMOPDE operator learning · Elasticitymean relative ℓ2 error: 0.0064 -> 0.0050Helped
replace Transolver with LaMOPDE operator learning · Navier–Stokesmean relative ℓ2 error: 0.0957 -> 0.0460Helped
replace Transolver with LaMOPDE operator learning · Darcymean relative ℓ2 error: 0.0059 -> 0.0039Helped
replace Transolver with LaMOPDE operator learning · Plasticitymean relative ℓ2 error: 0.0013 -> 0.0007Helped
replace Transolver with LaMOPDE operator learning · Airfoilmean relative ℓ2 error: 0.0053 -> 0.0041Helped
replace Transolver with LaMOPDE operator learning · Pipemean relative ℓ2 error: 0.0046 -> 0.0038Helped
increase the number of latent tokens (ablation)LaMO · Airfoilrelative L2: 0.0079 -> 0.0039 -> 0.0048Mixed
increase SSM DState with 1936 latent tokens and expand dim 1 (ablation)LaMO · Darcyrelative L2 loss: 0.0045 -> 0.0040Helped
increase SSM DState with 121 latent tokens and expand dim 1 (ablation)LaMO · Darcyrelative L2 loss: 0.0068 -> 0.0071Mixed
increase latent tokens from 121 to 1936 with expand dim 2 and DState 64 (ablation)LaMO · Darcyrelative L2 loss: 0.0066 -> 0.0038Helped
use unidirectional instead of bidirectional SSM (ablation)LaMO · Plasticityrelative ℓ2 error: 0.0007 -> 0.0022Hurt
use bidirectional SSM instead of patches (ablation)LaMO · Darcyrelative ℓ2 error: 0.0039 -> 0.0050Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Darcy Navier-Stokes Plasticity Airfoil Pipe Elasticity

Benchmarks: Darcy Navier-Stokes Plasticity Airfoil Pipe Elasticity

Metrics: mean relative L2 error

Baselines: UNET ResNet SWIN DeepONet WMT U-FNO FNO U-NO F-FNO LSM Galerkin Transformer HT-Net

Builds on: Mamba Transolver Fourier neural operator Perceiver Structured state space (S4)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy