atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Causal discovery

Position: Probabilistic Modelling is Sufficient for Causal Inference

ICML 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Causal discovery · approach: Causal effect identification · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Argues that standard probabilistic modelling (writing down the joint over all settings of interest) suffices for interventional and counterfactual causal inference, with do-notation and SCMs presented as syntactic shorthand within that framework.

Problem

Confusion in the ML community over whether causal inference requires a bespoke causal framework or notation beyond probability and statistics (e.g., Pearl's claims that a do-operator is needed).

Approach

Shows that interventional and counterfactual questions can be answered by writing a joint probabilistic model over observed and intervened/counterfactual settings ("twin model"), with do-calculus, SCMs and adjustment formulas reinterpreted as syntactic shorthand for such joints; illustrated with a log-normal aspirin example.

Key results

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Builds on: Structural Causal Models do-calculus Causal Bayesian Networks twin network

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy