atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

Optimal Fair Learning Robust to Adversarial Distribution Shift

ICML 2025 · Adversarial robustness and security › Certified and empirical robustness · approach: Theory of adversarial risk

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Theoretical study showing the randomized Fair Bayes Optimal Classifier (for demographic parity, equal opportunity, predictive equality) is locally Lipschitz robust to adversarial distribution shift, while the deterministic Fair BOC is not.

Problem

Robustness of accuracy and group-fairness guarantees of the optimal (Fair Bayes Optimal) binary classifier under adversarial/malicious noise in the data distribution, which is unclear once fairness constraints are added.

Approach

Shows deterministic Fair BOCs can be non-robust (accuracy jumps by Omega(1) under tiny TV shift), but the randomized Fair BOC, which is randomized on at most one domain point, has accuracy that is Lipschitz in total variation distance with a distribution-dependent constant, via decomposition of shifts into elementary mass transfers and a mass-threshold analysis.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use a randomized Fair BOC instead of a deterministic Fair BOCFair classification with Demographic Parity · Example 1accuracy: 0.5 − ϵHelped
Add Demographic Parity constraints to the deterministic BOCDeterministic BOC · Adversarial distribution shiftaccuracy difference across distributions: |Acc(f, P) − Acc(f′, P′)| ≥ Ω(1)Hurt
Use a randomized Fair BOC under Demographic ParityFair BOC · Adversarial distribution shiftaccuracy difference across distributions: \epsilon (1 + max (P(A), P′(A))/min(P(A), P′(A)) + max (P(D), P′(D))/min(P(D), P′(D)))Helped
Use a randomized Fair BOC under Equal OpportunityFair BOC · Adversarial distribution shiftaccuracy difference across distributions: \epsilon (1 + 2 max(P(1), P′(1))K(P, P′))Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Baselines: Blum et al. (2024) randomized closure PQ(H) Xian & Zhao (2024) sensitivity analysis Chen et al. (2024) deterministic Fair BOC

Builds on: Kearns & Li (1988) malicious noise Agarwal & Deshpande (2022) Fair BOC characterization Konstantinov & Lampert (2022)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy