Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Personalized and heterogeneous FL
Federated Causal Structure Learning with Non-identical Variable Sets
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes FedCDnv, a federated causal structure learning method for clients with non-identical (partially overlapping) variable sets, using theories to flag spurious dependencies and a two-level priority selection strategy (TPSS) to aggregate stable causal relationships.
Problem
Federated causal structure learning when clients observe overlapping but non-identical variable sets, where non-overlapping variable pairs create spurious dependencies and existing aggregation ignores the varying importance of edges within local graphs.
Approach
Classifies variable pairs as overlapping or non-overlapping, derives theorems/lemmas to mark definite causal and non-causal relations, defines stable relations via an interval of CI-test significance levels, and aggregates local FCI graphs on the server with a two-level priority selection (TPSS) weighted by sample size and p-value scaling.
Key results
- On the Sachs real-world dataset, FedCDnv reaches F1-edge 0.6967 versus 0.5823 for the best baseline FCI-base, roughly a 10-point gain.
- On Sachs, FedCDnv achieves F1-orientation 0.2861, higher than FedCDnv-vote (0.2544), CDUIOV (0.1211) and FCI-base (0.2488).
- On synthetic data, FedCDnv reports orientation F1 about 10% higher than compared methods; on benchmarks it gains 8-12% F1-orientation in four networks.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use FedCDnv instead of FedCDnv-vote's voting strategy (ablation) | FedCDnv · Sachs | F1-edge: 0.5778 ± 0.0998 -> 0.6967 ± 0.0316 | Helped |
| Use FedCDnv instead of FedCDnv-vote's voting strategy (ablation) | FedCDnv · Sachs | F1-orie: 0.2544 ± 0.0384 -> 0.2861 ± 0.0840 | Helped |
| Use FedCDnv instead of FCI-base | Federated causal structure learning with non-identical variable sets · Sachs | F1-edge: 0.5823 ± 0.1289 -> 0.6967 ± 0.0316 | Helped |
| Use FedCDnv instead of CDUIOV | Federated causal structure learning with non-identical variable sets · Sachs | F1-orie: 0.1211 ± 0.0021 -> 0.2861 ± 0.0840 | Helped |
| Extract only definite relationships using the proposed theories | FedCDnv · Synthetic networks with 10 to 150 variables | FDR-C | Mixed |
| Extract definite non-causal relationships using the proposed theories | FedCDnv · Synthetic networks with 10 to 150 variables | FDR-nC | Helped |
Surprising findings
- CDUIOV achieves the highest orientation precision on Sachs (0.8843) but with very low recall (0.0858), a trade-off attributed to its reliance on intervention targets.
- Definite causal relations have only about 1% lower average FDR than all identified causal relations, a modest effect.
Limitations
- Current theories for identifying definite relationships are acknowledged as not yet comprehensive.
- Assumes absolute latent confounders but no selection bias; privacy protection relies on p-value scaling without formal guarantees.
- Absolute accuracy on Sachs is modest (orientation F1 about 0.29).
Experimental setup
Datasets: Erdős-Rényi synthetic DAG data Child Alarm Insurance Barley Child3 Alarm3 Sachs
Benchmarks: Child Alarm Insurance Barley Child3 Alarm3 Sachs
Metrics: precision recall F1-edge F1-orientation FDR
Baselines: FedCDnv-vote CDUIOV CD-MiNi FCI-base Notears-ADMM FedPC FedCSL
Builds on: FCI RFCI Zhang orientation rules FedPC CD-MiNi
Closest papers by meaning
- FedCSL: A Scalable and Accurate Approach to Federated Causal Structure Learning (AAAI 2024 · similarity 0.92)
- Federated Causality Learning with Explainable Adaptive Optimization (AAAI 2024 · similarity 0.90)
- Federated Causal Discovery from Heterogeneous Data (ICLR 2024 · similarity 0.88)
- Decoupled Subgraph Federated Learning (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.87)
- Federated Causally Invariant Feature Learning (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.87)
- Federated Granger Causality Learning For Interdependent Clients With State Space Representation (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.86)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
