atlas

Research map / Optimization / Optimizers

Optimizing Social Network Interventions via Hypergradient-Based Recommender System Design

ICML 2025 · Optimization › Optimizers · approach: Surrogate losses and robust solvers · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes BeeRS, a gradient-based bilevel method that optimizes social network edge weights under Friedkin-Johnsen opinion dynamics using hypergradients computed via implicit differentiation, scaling to ~3M variables.

Problem

Mitigating polarization and disagreement in social networks by modifying interaction weights when user opinions evolve under Friedkin-Johnsen dynamics; existing methods are heuristic or solve bilevel problems that are NP-hard or non-convex and do not scale.

Approach

Treat the FJ equilibrium as an implicit mapping of network weights and run projected gradient descent with momentum on the weights, using hypergradients obtained by solving one linear system (adjoint/implicit differentiation), so the intervention accounts for how weight changes shift equilibrium opinions.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use BeeRS instead of NADNetwork intervention on Reddit · Redditchange in polarization P: $+128.7\%$ -> $-40.2\%$Helped
Use BeeRS instead of NADNetwork intervention on Reddit · Redditchange in disagreement D: $+41.4\%$ -> $-21.5\%$Helped
Use BeeRS instead of NAD* (λ = 0.2)Network intervention on Reddit · Redditchange in polarization P: $-0.7\%$ -> $-40.2\%$Helped
Use BeeRS instead of NAD* (λ = 0.2)Network intervention on Reddit · Redditchange in disagreement D: $+0.3\%$ -> $-21.5\%$Helped
Use BeeRS instead of NADNetwork intervention on Reddit · Redditmean runtime (s): 35.9 -> 82.9Hurt
Use BeeRS instead of IPOPTDBLP network intervention · DBLP, 100–2000 usersrelative suboptimality: IPOPT: $4.63\mathrm{e}\text{-3}$, $4.42\mathrm{e}\text{-3}$, $4.67\mathrm{e}\text{-3}$, $4.87\mathrm{e}\text{-3}$, $4.72Helped
Increase momentum γ for small step sizes (ablation)BeeRS · DBLP, 1000 usersiterations until convergenceHelped
Set γ = 0.95 rather than lower momentum at small step sizes (ablation)BeeRS · DBLP, 1000 usersminimum costHelped
Use a medium step size with low γ rather than γ = 0.95 (ablation)BeeRS · DBLP, 1000 usersminimum costHelped
Use larger step sizes (ablation)BeeRS · DBLP, 1000 usersminimum costHurt
Scale α proportional to n rather than use a constant step size (ablation)BeeRS · DBLP, varying number of usersiterations until convergenceHelped
Use α = 30,000 and γ = 0.95 instead of α = 10,000 and γ = 0.9 (ablation)BeeRS · DBLP, 3,079,007 nodesobjective stability near convergenceHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: DBLP citation network Reddit network dataset

Benchmarks: DBLP (3,079,007 nodes) Reddit (553 users)

Metrics: runtime (s) polarization reduction (%) disagreement reduction (%) relative suboptimality

Baselines: IPOPT NAD NAD with regularization

Builds on: Friedkin-Johnsen model implicit function theorem Network Administrator Dynamics (NAD) projected gradient descent with momentum

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy