atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Optimal transport

Towards Understanding Gradient Dynamics of the Sliced-Wasserstein Distance via Critical Point Analysis

ICML 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Optimal transport · approach: Sliced Wasserstein variants · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Theoretical analysis of critical points of the sliced-Wasserstein objective (squared SW_2 to a target), introducing Lagrangian critical points and proving that stable critical points cannot contain segments in dimension 2, with gradient-descent experiments.

Problem

Understanding the optimization dynamics and critical points of the sliced-Wasserstein distance when used as an objective for approximating a target measure with particles, including whether bad (lower-dimensional) critical points are stable.

Approach

Defines Lagrangian and barycentric Lagrangian critical points of SW_2^2 for measures, shows their equivalence under compact support and atomless assumptions, constructs explicit lower-dimensional critical points via symmetry, and proves that measures containing a segment are unstable in d=2.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Perturb the segment by alternating points between e₂ and −e₂SW²₂ objective · Normal targetSW²₂ loss under perturbationHelped
Perturb the segment by alternating points between e₂ and −e₂SW²₂ objective · Sliced-uniform targetSW²₂ loss under perturbationHelped
Perturb the segment by alternating points between e₂ and −e₂SW²₂ objective · Uniform shell targetSW²₂ loss under perturbationHelped
Perturb the segment in a point cloud with a more complex shape, leaving other points unchangedSW²₂ objective · Point cloud containing a horizontal segmentSW²₂ loss under perturbationHelped
Use step sizes close to λ = dNSW²₂ gradient descent · Normal and sliced-uniform targetsLoss decrease in the first iterationsHelped
Use lower step sizesSW²₂ gradient descent · Normal and sliced-uniform targetsConvergence speedHurt
Use step sizes larger than 2dNSW²₂ gradient descent · Normal and sliced-uniform targetsConvergenceHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: SW_2^2 value along perturbations SW_2^2 loss convergence under gradient descent

Builds on: Sliced-Wasserstein distance Lagrangian critical points of Wasserstein distance Bonnotte's SW differentiability results Lloyd's algorithm for Wasserstein (Power cells)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy