atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

Learning State-Based Node Representations from a Class Hierarchy for Fine-Grained Open-Set Detection

ICML 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Recognition and long-tail · approach: Correspondence and causal representation learning

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes State-FGOD, which encodes a class hierarchy as legal global states over nodes (with openset child nodes) and trains a ViT-B/16 prompt-tuned classifier to detect fine-grained openset samples, with theory showing local/path-probability methods are suboptimal.

Problem

Fine-grained openset detection (FGOD): identifying openset samples that are semantically similar to closed-set classes and assigning them to the correct openset parent node in a class hierarchy, where local top-down detectors accumulate errors and global detectors ignore hierarchical dependencies.

Approach

Model the hierarchy (augmented with openset nodes) as a graph with subsumption and exclusion edges, define legal global states (each corresponding to a leaf or none), and compute state and node probabilities from logits so that the cross-entropy loss updates all ground-truth ancestors and non-ground-truth nodes; train with random removal of nodes to create openset cases.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use State-FGOD instead of E-HNDViT-B/16 + Prompt · CUB-200-2011AUC: 45.59 -> 51.04Helped
Use State-FGOD instead of RelabelViT-B/16 + Prompt · Tiny ImageNetAUC: 17.58 -> 20.03Helped
Use State-FGOD instead of LOOViT-B/16 + Prompt · AWA2AUC: 45.31 -> 48.13Helped
Use State-FGOD instead of E-HNDViT-B/16 + Prompt · Stanford CarsAUC: 28.81 -> 35.05Helped
Use State-FGOD instead of LOOViT-B/16 + Prompt · CIFAR-100AUC: 18.38 -> 20.69Helped
Add state representation (ablation)DARTS on CUB-200-2011 · CUB-200-2011AUC: 41.82 -> 46.71Helped
Add state representation (ablation)Relabel on CUB-200-2011 · CUB-200-2011OA@50: 50.95 -> 59.80Helped
Add state representation (ablation)LOO on CUB-200-2011 · CUB-200-2011AUC: 38.45 -> 46.23Helped
Add prompt tuning (ablation)State-FGOD on CUB-200-2011 · CUB-200-2011OA@50: 55.31 -> 64.47Helped
Add state representation (ablation)State-FGOD on CUB-200-2011 · CUB-200-2011AUC: 38.45 -> 51.04Helped
Use prompt tuning instead of ResNet101 (ablation)State-FGOD on CUB-200-2011 · CUB-200-2011OA@50: 45.63 -> 64.47Helped
Add path probability (ablation)TD on CUB-200-2011 · CUB-200-2011OA: 18.75 -> 21.16Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Tiny ImageNet CUB-200-2011 AWA2 Stanford Cars CIFAR-100

Benchmarks: CUB-200-2011 Tiny ImageNet AWA2 Stanford Cars CIFAR-100

Metrics: openset accuracy closed-set accuracy AUC OA@50 HMean hierarchical precision hierarchical recall top-2 accuracy

Baselines: TD MSP HC-EN DARTS Relabel Evidential LOO TD+LOO E-HND

Builds on: Leave-One-Out openset training (Lee et al., 2018) E-HND visual prompt tuning (Jia et al., 2022) Relabel (Lee et al., 2018)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy