Research map / Time series / Causal and generative time series
LSCD: Lomb--Scargle Conditioned Diffusion for Time series Imputation
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes LSCD, a score-based diffusion model for time series imputation conditioned on a differentiable Lomb-Scargle periodogram spectrum (plus a spectral consistency loss), evaluated on synthetic sines and PhysioNet/PM2.5.
Problem
Time series with missing or irregularly sampled values break FFT-based frequency analysis, which needs uniform sampling and pre-interpolation that distorts spectra; imputation methods typically ignore spectral consistency.
Approach
Compute a differentiable Lomb-Scargle periodogram directly from observed (irregular, masked) values, filter it by false alarm probability, encode it with an attention-based spectrum encoder to condition a CSDI-style conditional diffusion model at every denoising step, and add a spectral consistency loss on the reconstructed series during a final fine-tuning stage.
Key results
- On Physionet at 10% missing, LSCD reaches MAE 0.211 and RMSE 0.494 versus CSDI's 0.219 and 0.545.
- On Sines (MCAR 50%), LSCD reduces S-MAE to 0.014 versus 0.027 for CSDI, the strongest baseline on spectral error.
- On PM2.5 (10% missing), LSCD gets MAE 9.069 versus 9.670 for CSDI and S-MAE 0.022 versus 0.023.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Condition diffusion imputation on the Lomb–Scargle spectrum | LSCD · Sines, point missing 0.5 | S-MAE: 0.027 -> 0.014 | Helped |
| Add spectral consistency loss (ablation) | LSCD · PhysioNet, 10% missing | MAE: 0.213 -> 0.211 | Helped |
| Add the spectral encoder alongside spectral consistency loss (ablation) | LSCD · PhysioNet, 10% missing | MAE: 0.218 -> 0.213 | Helped |
| Add Lomb–Scargle conditioning alongside the spectral encoder and consistency loss (ablation) | LSCD · PhysioNet, 10% missing | MAE: 0.219 -> 0.218 | Helped |
| Add spectral consistency loss (ablation) | LSCD · PM2.5 | MAE: 9.085 -> 9.069 | Helped |
| Add spectral consistency loss (ablation) | LSCD · PM2.5 | S-MAE: 0.0223 -> 0.0219 | Helped |
| Use LSCD instead of SAITS | Sines, sequence missing 0.1 · Sines, sequence missing 0.1 | MAE: 1.323 -> 1.359 | Hurt |
| Use LSCD instead of CSDI | Sines, point missing 0.1 · Sines, point missing 0.1 | S-MAE: 0.008 -> 0.003 | Helped |
Surprising findings
- At 90% missingness on Physionet, the reported S-MAE of LSCD (0.093) ties CSDI, so gains in spectral error largely vanish at high missingness.
- The ablation shows removing the Lomb-Scargle conditioning has only small effects on MAE (0.219 vs 0.211 at 10% missing), suggesting modest contributions per component.
Limitations
- The grid-based diffusion architecture needs interpolation time points known at training time, unlike continuous-time methods.
- The Lomb-Scargle periodogram assumes sinusoidal structure, and the spectral consistency loss can bias the model away from the score-matching optimum.
- Physionet S-MAE gains vanish at 90% missingness, and the PM2.5 missingness is partly artificial.
Experimental setup
Datasets: Synthetic Sines PhysioNet PM2.5 Beijing air quality
Benchmarks: Synthetic Sines PhysioNet PM2.5
Metrics: MAE RMSE S-MAE CRPS
Baselines: Mean Lerp BRITS GPVAE US-GAN TimesNet SAITS CSDI ModernTCN
Builds on: CSDI Lomb-Scargle periodogram score-based diffusion models
Closest papers by meaning
- HyFAD: Hybrid Time-Frequency Diffusion with Frequency-Aware Embedding for Time Series Imputation (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.89)
- Discretizing Continuous Time Series for Imputation with Masked Diffusion Training (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.88)
- Diffusion Transformers for Imputation: Statistical Efficiency and Uncertainty Quantification (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.88)
- ProCTI: Prototype-Refined Global Conditioning for Diffusion-Based Time Series Imputation (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.88)
- SigDiffusions: Score-Based Diffusion Models for Time Series via Log-Signature Embeddings (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.87)
- Zero-shot Imputation with Foundation Inference Models for Dynamical Systems (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.86)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
