atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Optimal transport

Hierarchical Refinement: Optimal Transport to Infinity and Beyond

ICML 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Optimal transport · approach: Transport map estimation · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Hierarchical Refinement (HiRef), which recursively co-clusters two equal-size datasets with low-rank OT subproblems to recover a full-rank Monge map in linear space and log-linear time.

Problem

Computing full-rank (one-to-one) optimal transport between large datasets: Sinkhorn needs quadratic memory, low-rank OT cannot produce bijections, and mini-batch OT is biased.

Approach

Optimal low-rank factors co-cluster each point with its Monge image, so recursively partitioning both datasets with rank-r low-rank OT subproblems (uniform inner marginal) yields a bijective Monge map at the finest scale in linear space and log-linear time.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use HiRef instead of MB 1024ImageNet alignment · ImageNet alignmentprimal OT cost: 19.58 -> 18.97Helped
Use HiRef instead of MB 1024MOSTA transcriptomics alignment · E12-13.5, E13-14.5, E14-15.5, E15-16.5Kantorovich cost: 14.45 -> 14.35; 13.86 -> 13.78; 14.43 -> 14.29; 12.91 -> 12.79Helped
Use HiRef instead of FRLCImageNet alignment · ImageNet alignmentprimal OT cost: 24.12 -> 18.97Helped
Use HiRef instead of FRLC or LOTMERFISH brain atlas alignment · Five spatially-varying genescosine similarityHelped
Refine coarse low-rank couplings hierarchicallyHiRef · Synthetic datasetsprimal OT costHelped
Use HiRef instead of MOPSynthetic datasets · Checkerboard, MAF Moons & Rings, and Half Moon & S-Curveprimal OT costHelped
Use HiRef instead of Sinkhorn or ProgOTFull-rank OT alignment · Synthetic datasets with 1024 aligned pairsnumber of non-zero coupling entries: 1024 vs 624733 to 678720 and 271087 to 337258Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Half-Moon and S-Curve Checkerboard MAFMoons and Rings MOSTA mouse organogenesis spatiotemporal transcriptomics MERFISH mouse brain atlas ImageNet ILSVRC

Benchmarks: Half-Moon and S-Curve Checkerboard MAFMoons and Rings MOSTA MERFISH ImageNet

Metrics: primal OT cost Wasserstein-1 Wasserstein-2 number of non-zero coupling entries runtime scaling cosine similarity of transferred gene expression

Baselines: Sinkhorn ProgOT mini-batch OT LOT FRLC MOP dual revised simplex

Builds on: Sinkhorn algorithm FRLC multiscale optimal transport (Gerber and Maggioni) ProgOT

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy