atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Spiking networks

Efficient ANN-SNN Conversion with Error Compensation Learning

ICML 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › Spiking networks · approach: Training deep spiking networks · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes an ANN-to-SNN conversion framework combining a learnable-threshold clipping activation, dual-threshold neurons, and optimal membrane potential initialization to reach high accuracy at ultra-low latency (2-4 time steps).

Problem

ANN-to-SNN conversion suffers large accuracy loss at low latency due to clipping, quantization, and uneven-activation conversion errors, requiring many time steps.

Approach

Jointly mitigates the three conversion errors: a learnable-threshold clip-floor-shift activation trained in the ANN so its threshold maps directly to the SNN threshold (removing clipping error); dual-threshold neurons that emit negative spikes to cancel over-fired spikes (reducing quantization and unevenness error); and initializing membrane potential to half the threshold.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add a dual-threshold neuron (ablation)converted ResNet-18 SNN · CIFAR-10, T=2accuracy: 75.44% -> 94.75%; +19.31%Helped
Add a dual-threshold neuron (ablation)converted ResNet-20 SNN · CIFAR-100, T=2accuracy: 19.96% -> 42.91%; +22.95%Helped
Increase quantization steps from L=2 to L=4 (ablation)converted VGG-16 SNN · CIFAR-10, T=2accuracy: 94.35% -> 93.53%Hurt
Increase quantization steps from L=2 to L=4 (ablation)converted VGG-16 SNN · CIFAR-100, T=2accuracy: 73.78% -> 72.58%Hurt
Increase quantization steps from L=2 to L=4 (ablation)converted VGG-16 SNN · CIFAR-10, T=4accuracy: 95.04% -> 95.15%Mixed
Increase quantization steps from L=2 to L=4 (ablation)converted VGG-16 SNN · CIFAR-100, T=4accuracy: 75.70% -> 76.50%Helped
Use the proposed conversion instead of QCFSResNet-18 SNN · CIFAR-10, T=2accuracy: 75.44% -> 94.75%Helped
Use the proposed conversion instead of QCFSResNet-34 SNN · ImageNet, T=16accuracy: 59.35% -> 72.37%Helped
Use the proposed conversion instead of QCFSVGG-16 SNN · CIFAR-100, T=2accuracy: 63.79% -> 72.58%Helped
Use the proposed conversion at T=16 instead of ANN inferenceVGG-16 · CIFAR-100energy: 4.170 -> 0.034Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 ImageNet

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 ImageNet

Metrics: top-1 accuracy energy consumption (mJ)

Baselines: RMP TSC RTS RNL Opt QCFS SNNC-AP

Builds on: QCFS Opt SRP RMP

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy