atlas

Research map / Image generation / Fast diffusion sampling

TCP-Diffusion: A Multi-modal Diffusion Model for Global Tropical Cyclone Precipitation Forecasting with Change Awareness

ICML 2025 · Image generation › Fast diffusion sampling · approach: Diffusion models as perception tools · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes TCP-Diffusion, a multi-modal conditional diffusion model that forecasts 12-hour global tropical cyclone rainfall fields by predicting adjacent rainfall residuals (ARP) and conditioning on environmental variables and ERA5-IFS forecasts.

Problem

Forecasting tropical cyclone (TC) precipitation around a moving TC center globally is under-studied, and existing DL rainfall nowcasting methods accumulate errors, lack physical consistency, and ignore TC-related meteorological factors and NWP forecasts.

Approach

Replace absolute rainfall prediction with adjacent residual prediction (predicting 3-hourly rainfall changes that are accumulated onto the latest observation), inside a diffusion model whose 3D U-Net is conditioned on multi-modal historical encoders and an NWP future-forecast encoder.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add adjacent residual prediction (ARP) (ablation)Spatio-temporal diffusion baseline · TC precipitation test set, 3–12 hETS-24: 0.12474 -> 0.13014Helped
Add multi-modal TC environment information (ablation)ARP model · TC precipitation test set, 3–12 hETS-24: 0.13014 -> 0.14253Helped
Add NWP forecast inputs (ablation)ARP + multi-modal environment model · TC precipitation test set, 3–12 hETS-24: 0.14253 -> 0.14703Helped
Use TCP-Diffusion instead of U-NetTC precipitation forecasting · TC precipitation test set, 3–12 hETS-6: 0.44169 -> 0.43788Hurt
Use TCP-Diffusion instead of PersistenceTC precipitation forecasting · TC precipitation test set, 3–12 hETS-24: 0.14530 -> 0.14703Helped
Use TCP-Diffusion instead of ECMWF-IFSNWP comparison · NWP comparison test samplesETS-24: 0.08348 -> 0.12790Helped
Use TCP-Diffusion instead of FuXiTC precipitation forecasting · TC precipitation, 2020 samples, 6–12 hETS-24: 0.03113 -> 0.10348Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: IBTrACS MSWEP ERA5 ERA5-IFS TIGGE ECMWF-IFS

Benchmarks: MSWEP-based TC rainfall test set (126 TCs, 2018-2020) TIGGE ECMWF-IFS comparison

Metrics: ETS-6 ETS-24 ETS-60 TP_MAE RAPSD rainfall frequency distribution

Baselines: U-Net PreDiff NowcastNet Persistence ECMWF-IFS ERA5-IFS FuXi

Builds on: denoising diffusion probabilistic models 3D U-Net PreDiff NowcastNet

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy