atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Domain adaptation and generalization

Balanced Learning for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentation

ICML 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Domain adaptation and generalization · approach: Adaptation for semantic segmentation · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes BLDA, a plug-and-play logits-distribution alignment method (post-hoc and online GMM-based) with a cumulative-density regression auxiliary loss to reduce class bias in self-training UDA for semantic segmentation.

Problem

Self-training for unsupervised domain adaptive semantic segmentation learns classes unevenly due to class imbalance and label/data distribution shift between domains, causing over- and under-predicted classes.

Approach

Assess class bias from per-class positive and negative logit distributions, align each class's logit CDF to shared anchor distributions (post-hoc and online via GMMs with logit correction terms in the loss), and use the resulting cumulative density value as a domain-shared auxiliary regression target.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add BLDA to DACSDACS · GTA→CSmIoU: 52.1 -> 54.7Helped
Add BLDA to DAFormerDAFormer · GTA→CSmIoU: 68.3 -> 70.7Helped
Add BLDA to MICMIC · SYN→CSmIoU: 67.3 -> 69.1Helped
Add BLDA to DAFormerDAFormer · GTA→CSmAcc: 77.8 -> 82.0Helped
Add post-hoc logit adjustment (ablation)DAFormer on GTA→CS · GTA→CSmIoU: 68.3 -> 69.2Helped
Add source-only online logit adjustment (ablation)DAFormer on GTA→CS · GTA→CSmIoU: 68.3 -> 68.9Helped
Apply online logit adjustment in source and target domains (ablation)DAFormer on GTA→CS · GTA→CSmIoU: 68.3 -> 70.2Helped
Add cumulative density estimation to OLA (ablation)DAFormer on GTA→CS · GTA→CSmIoU: 70.2 -> 70.7Helped
Set GMM components K to 5 instead of K=1 (ablation)BLDA with DAFormer · GTA→CSmIoU: 70.2 -> 70.7Helped
Set GMM components K to 10 instead of K=5 (ablation)BLDA with DAFormer · GTA→CSmIoU: 70.7 -> 70.6Hurt
Set momentum factor to 0.99 (ablation)BLDA with DAFormer · GTA→CSmIoU: 68.6 -> 70.7Helped
Set EM loops to 3 rather than 1 (ablation)BLDA with DAFormer · GTA→CSmIoU: 70.4 -> 70.7Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: GTAv SYNTHIA Cityscapes ImageNet-1k VisDA-2017 VIPER BDD100k

Benchmarks: GTA->Cityscapes SYNTHIA->Cityscapes VisDA-2017 VIPER->Cityscapes-Seq VIPER->BDD100k

Metrics: mIoU mAcc std of per-class IoU/Acc

Baselines: DACS DAFormer CDAC HRDA MIC AdaptSegNet CRST PLCA ProDA CPSL TransDA ADFormer

Builds on: DAFormer HRDA MIC CDAC DACS

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy