atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Knowledge and temporal graphs

CSG-ODE: ControlSynth Graph ODE For Modeling Complex Evolution of Dynamic Graphs

ICML 2025 · Graph learning › Knowledge and temporal graphs · approach: Continuous-time dynamic graph learning

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes CSG-ODE, a VAE-based graph neural ODE with information-propagation edge importance and nonlinear ODE sub-networks for irregular dynamic graphs, plus a stable variant SCSG-ODE with antisymmetric weights.

Problem

Graph neural ODE models for incomplete, irregularly sampled dynamic graphs struggle to capture time-varying inter-node relationships and nonlinear node state evolution.

Approach

Combines a communicability-derivative (Fréchet derivative) based edge importance weight with latent correlations to guide adaptive graph convolutional recurrent encoding, and decodes with an ODE that includes a control term from a GNN plus multiple nonlinear sub-networks; SCSG-ODE constrains the weight matrix to be antisymmetric for stability.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use CSG-ODE instead of LG-ODEdynamic graph prediction · Motion-walk interpolation 40%MSE ×10−2: 0.0823 -> 0.0439Helped
use CSG-ODE instead of LG-CSODEdynamic graph prediction · Charged interpolation 40%MSE ×10−2: 0.7794 -> 0.7947Hurt
use CSG-ODE instead of LG-ODEdynamic graph prediction · Motion-jump extrapolation 40%MSE ×10−2: 0.2743 -> 0.1393Helped
replace mean-observation node representations with adaptive node representation matrix Q (ablation)CSG-ODE · Springs interpolation 40%MSE ×10−2: 0.1550 -> 0.1520Hurt
add information propagation-based inter-node importance weights (ablation)CSG-ODE · Springs interpolation 40%MSE ×10−2: 0.1841 -> 0.1550Helped
add control function g(·) (ablation)CSG-ODE · Springs interpolation 40%MSE ×10−2: 0.1655 -> 0.1550Helped
add the nonlinear term (ablation)CSG-ODE · Springs interpolation 40%MSE ×10−2: 0.1913 -> 0.1550Helped
constrain weight matrices to learnable antisymmetric formsSCSG-ODE · Motion-walk extrapolation 40%MSE ×10−2 standard deviation: 0.0092 -> 0.0056Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Springs Charged CMU motion capture (walk subject 35, jump subject 118) PEMS08

Benchmarks: Springs Charged CMU motion capture walk CMU motion capture jump PEMS08

Metrics: MSE

Baselines: Latent-ODE Weight-Decay Edge-GNN NRI+RNN LG-ODE LG-CSODE

Builds on: LG-ODE ControlSynth ODE (CSODE) Latent ODE Graph ODE in VAE framework NRI

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy