atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Differential privacy

Distributed Differentially Private Data Analytics via Secure Sketching

ICML 2025 · Federated learning and privacy › Differential privacy · approach: Privacy accounting and mechanisms · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces the linear-transformation model, an intermediate distributed DP model where clients noise their data locally and a trusted public linear sketch (computed via secret sharing MPC) is applied, and derives low-rank approximation and ridge regression mechanisms with error independent of the number of clients.

Problem

Distributed differentially private data analysis that avoids both a single trusted server (central model) and the high noise of the local model, for problems like low-rank approximation and ridge regression.

Approach

Clients add local noise to their data, then a public linear transformation (oblivious sparse JL/OSNAP sketch) is computed securely across multiple servers via linear secret sharing; the noise from many clients aggregates through the linear sketch, reducing per-client noise and yielding error independent of the number of clients.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use LTM instead of the local modelFrequency estimation · Frequency estimationerror: \tilde{O}(\sqrt{n}) -> \tilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-1})Helped
Use LTM instead of the local modelLow-rank approximation · Low-rank approximationadditive error: (O(k^2nd)) -> \tilde{O}(\frac{kd^{3/2}}{\alpha_\mathbf{S}^3} \varepsilon^{-1} )Helped
Use LTM instead of the central modelLow-rank approximation · Low-rank approximationadditive error: \tilde{O}(\frac{kd^{3/2}}{\alpha_\mathbf{S}^3} \varepsilon^{-1} ) vs. \tilde{\Theta}(k\sqrt{d}\varepsilon^{-1})Mixed
Use LTM instead of the central modelFrequency estimation · Frequency estimationerror: \tilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-1}) vs. \tilde{\Theta}(\varepsilon^{-1})No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: multiplicative error additive error

Baselines: central model low-rank approximation (exponential mechanism) local model low-rank approximation shuffle model frequency estimation local model frequency estimation

Builds on: OSNAP shuffle model multi-central model Gaussian mechanism Laplace mechanism

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy