atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Combinatorial and search optimization

End-to-End Learning Framework for Solving Non-Markovian Optimal Control

ICML 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Combinatorial and search optimization · approach: Constrained neural network optimization · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Derives LQR optimal control for fractional-order linear time-invariant systems, proposes a least-squares system identification with sample-complexity bounds, and builds FOLOC, an end-to-end RNN/Transformer/FNO framework that jointly identifies system parameters and predicts optimal control.

Problem

Optimal control and system identification for fractional-order linear time-invariant (FOLTI) systems, which are non-Markovian with long-range memory and lack standard control methodologies.

Approach

Extends LQR to Grünwald–Letnikov fractional-order discrete dynamics via closed-form least-squares and Lagrange-multiplier solutions, and couples a learned system-identification module (RNN+MLP, attention encoder) with a Fourier Neural Operator control module under a composite loss.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use fractional-order system learning rather than LTI system learningTheoretical system identification · Synthetic FOLTI systemmean MSE: decreases by 81.36%Helped
Increase the time horizon from T = 8 to T = 128FOLOC · Synthetic FOLTI systemMSE and MAE: decrease by 97.37% and 92.23% respectivelyHelped
Vary fractional order across alpha = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9FOLOC · Synthetic FOLTI systemMSE and MAENo clear effect
Increase state dimension from n = 2 to n = 6 or n = 8FOLOC · Synthetic FOLTI systemMSE and MAE: 13.01% (18.79%) at n = 6 and 24.06% (25.45%) at n=8Helped
Vary training sample count from N = 1000 to N = 8000FOLOC · Synthetic FOLTI systemMSE: MSE only decreases by 1.65% at N = 1000 compared with N = 8000No clear effect
Use non-Gaussian process noise instead of Gaussian noiseFOLOC · Synthetic FOLTI systemMSE/MAE: maximal increases of MSE/MAE by 24.42%/6.67% (Cauchy/Sinc-squared)Hurt
Vary Gaussian noise scaleFOLOC · Synthetic FOLTI systemMSE and MAENo clear effect
Vary Gaussian noise scaleFOLOC · Cart-poleMSE and MAENo clear effect
Vary Gaussian noise scaleFOLOC · QuadrotorMSE and MAENo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: synthetic FOLTI trajectories with Gaussian and other noise cart-pole simulated dynamics quadrotor simulated dynamics

Benchmarks: synthetic FOLTI systems cart-pole dynamics quadrotor dynamics

Metrics: MSE MAE

Baselines: end-to-end LTI learning framework

Builds on: linear quadratic regulator Grünwald–Letnikov fractional derivative Fourier Neural Operator neural operator-assisted Krylov iterations

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy