atlas

Research map / Image generation / Autoregressive and latent generation

RODEO: Robust Outlier Detection via Exposing Adaptive Out-of-Distribution Samples

ICML 2024 · Image generation › Autoregressive and latent generation · approach: Generalizable fake image detection · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes RODEO, which generates near-distribution, diverse outlier exposure data by CLIP-guided diffusion from inlier images, then adversarially trains an outlier detector on it to improve robust outlier detection.

Problem

Outlier detection performance collapses under adversarial attacks, largely because outlier exposure during adversarial training uses fixed, distant auxiliary outliers that do not teach robust features.

Approach

Generate outlier exposure data by starting a pretrained diffusion model from noised inlier images (partial denoising from a random step t0 in [0.3T, 0.6T]) and guiding it with CLIP toward near-outlier text labels (semantically similar labels plus negative-attribute prompts), with threshold-based filtering; then adversarially train a classifier with an extra outlier class.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use Adaptive OE instead of ImageNet OE (ablation)RODEO · Novelty Detection, mean across datasetsAUROC (%) under PGD-1000: 36.5 -> 65.6Helped
use Adaptive OE instead of Gaussian noise OE (ablation)RODEO · Novelty Detection, mean across datasetsAUROC (%) under PGD-1000: 7.1 -> 65.6Helped
use Adaptive OE instead of ImageNet Mixup (ablation)RODEO · Novelty Detection, mean across datasetsAUROC (%) under PGD-1000: 25.3 -> 65.6Helped
use Adaptive OE instead of FITYMI (ablation)RODEO · Novelty Detection, mean across datasetsAUROC (%) under PGD-1000: 20.6 -> 65.6Helped
use Adaptive OE instead of GOE (ablation)RODEO · Novelty Detection, mean across datasetsAUROC (%) under PGD-1000: 29.4 -> 65.6Helped
use Adaptive OE instead of Dream-OOD (ablation)RODEO · Novelty Detection, mean across datasetsAUROC (%) under PGD-1000: 22.7 -> 65.6Helped
use adaptive synthesized outliers rather than fixed OE (ablation)RODEO · Novelty Detection, mean across datasetsFDC: 1.971 -> 3.325Helped
replace Tiny ImageNet OE with SVHN, MNIST, or Gaussian noise (ablation)ALOE and ATD on CIFAR10 vs CIFAR100 · CIFAR10 vs CIFAR100Detection performance under adversarial attacksHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR10 CIFAR100 MNIST FashionMNIST SVHN MVTecAD Head-CT BrainMRI Tumor Detection Covid19 ImageNet-30 ImageNet

Benchmarks: CIFAR10 CIFAR100 MNIST FashionMNIST SVHN MVTecAD Head-CT BrainMRI Tumor Detection Covid19 ImageNet-30

Metrics: AUROC FID Density Coverage FDC

Baselines: ViT-MSP ATOM ALOE ATD EXOE PLP Dream-OOD GOE FITYMI PatchCore

Builds on: Outlier Exposure adversarial training CLIP FITYMI Dream-OOD

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy