Research map / Image generation / Fast diffusion sampling
Neural Diffusion Models
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes Neural Diffusion Models, which learn a time-dependent non-linear data transformation inside the forward process and train it with a simulation-free variational bound, reporting state-of-the-art likelihood on ImageNet and CelebA-HQ.
Problem
Standard diffusion models use a fixed, linear forward (noising) process, which limits flexibility and leaves a gap between the variational bound and the true negative log-likelihood.
Approach
Generalize the DDIM-style implicit forward process by applying a learnable time-dependent transformation F_phi(x,t) to data before noise injection, optimize the full variational bound simulation-free, and derive continuous-time SDE/ODE forms with JVP for exact time derivatives.
Key results
- NDM reaches 3.55 BPD on ImageNet 32 and 3.35 BPD on ImageNet 64, beating VDM (3.72, 3.40), and 2.70 BPD on CIFAR-10 versus VDM's 2.65.
- On CelebA-HQ-256, latent NDM improves LSGM's NLL bound from <=0.70 to <=0.65 with FID 7.18 vs 7.22.
- With matched architectures and 1000 steps, NDM gets 3.02 vs DDPM 3.11 NLL on CIFAR-10, but NDM's FID is slightly worse (11.82 vs 11.44).
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use learnable time-dependent data transformations instead of fixed identity transformation | NDM versus DDPM · CIFAR-10, 1000 steps | NLL: 3.11 -> 3.02 | Helped |
| Use learnable time-dependent data transformations instead of fixed identity transformation | NDM versus DDPM · ImageNet 32, 1000 steps | NLL: 3.89 -> 3.79 | Helped |
| Use learnable time-dependent data transformations instead of fixed identity transformation | NDM versus DDPM · CIFAR-10, 1000 steps | FID: 11.44 -> 11.82 | Hurt |
| Use learnable time-dependent data transformations instead of fixed identity transformation | NDM versus DDPM · CIFAR-10, 10 steps | FID: 37.83 -> 31.56 | Helped |
| Train with 1000 steps and reduce sampling to 10 steps | NDM versus DDPM · CIFAR-10 | FID: 43.85 -> 48.41 | Hurt |
| Replace LSGM linear diffusion with learnable transformations | Latent NDM · CelebA-HQ-256 | FID: 7.22 -> 7.18 | Helped |
Surprising findings
- Using the simplified noise-prediction loss instead of the full objective can collapse the learned transformation to zero.
- NDM is less robust than DDPM when sampling with fewer steps than it was trained with (e.g., 1000 to 10 steps degrades FID more).
Limitations
- Learnable transformations roughly double parameter count and make training about 2.3x slower than DDPM.
- Conditional generation with classifier guidance is not directly supported when the forward process is learned.
- Less robust than DDPM to reduced sampling step counts.
Experimental setup
Datasets: MNIST CIFAR-10 ImageNet 32 ImageNet 64 CelebA-HQ-256 2D checkerboard
Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 ImageNet 32 ImageNet 64 CelebA-HQ-256 MNIST
Metrics: NLL (bits per dimension) NELBO FID
Baselines: DDPM Improved DDPM VDM Score SDE Score Flow LSGM
Builds on: DDPM DDIM Variational Diffusion Models LSGM Score SDE
Closest papers by meaning
- Neural Flow Diffusion Models: Learnable Forward Process for Improved Diffusion Modelling (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.93)
- Revisiting Diffusion Models: From Generative Pre-training to One-Step Generation (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.90)
- Plug-and-Play Diffusion Distillation (CVPR 2024 · similarity 0.90)
- Unified Generation, Reconstruction, and Representation: Generalized Diffusion with Adaptive Latent Encoding-Decoding (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.90)
- Learning Diffusion Models with Flexible Representation Guidance (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.90)
- DisCo-Diff: Enhancing Continuous Diffusion Models with Discrete Latents (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.90)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
