atlas

Research map / Image generation / Fast diffusion sampling

What’s the score? Automated Denoising Score Matching for Nonlinear Diffusions

ICML 2024 · Image generation › Fast diffusion sampling · approach: Diffusion theory and learned samplers · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces local-DSM, a denoising score matching objective built from local transition increments with Taylor-linearized nonlinear drifts, enabling automated score training for nonlinear diffusions in generative modeling and statistical physics.

Problem

Score-based training of diffusions with nonlinear inference processes is hard: ISM needs noisy Hutchinson divergence estimates, and DSM needs transition kernel scores unavailable in closed form for nonlinear drifts.

Approach

Derive a local DSM ELBO using transitions q(y_t|y_s) over nearby times s<t, approximate those transitions by locally linearizing the drift via a first-order Taylor expansion (solved with matrix-factorization matrix exponentials), and choose time pairs (s,t) via a schedule so that the integral of gg^T over [s,t] is constant to control linearization error.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace ISM ELBO training with local-DSM ELBODiffusion model with Logistic prior · CIFAR-10BPD: ≤ 3.741 ± 0.09 -> ≤ 3.568 ± 0.07Helped
Replace ISM ELBO training with local-DSM ELBODiffusion model with MoG prior · CIFAR-10BPD: ≤ 3.637 ± 0.14 -> ≤ 3.496 ± 0.11Helped
Add perceptual weighting to local-DSM (ablation)Diffusion model with Logistic prior · CIFAR-10BPD: ≤ 3.568 ± 0.07 -> ≤ 3.561 ± 0.09No clear effect
Add perceptual weighting to local-DSM (ablation)Diffusion model with MoG prior · CIFAR-10BPD: ≤ 3.496 ± 0.11 -> ≤ 3.503 ± 0.151No clear effect
Increase scheduled-pair λ from 0.01 to 0.05 (ablation)Local-DSM with Logistic prior · CIFAR-10BPD: ≤ 3.566 ± 0.097 -> ≤ 3.422 ± 0.096Helped
Increase scheduled-pair λ from 0.01 to 0.05 (ablation)Local-DSM with MoG prior · CIFAR-10BPD: ≤ 3.465 ± 0.1242 -> ≤ 3.354 ± 0.1879Helped
Increase scheduled-pair λ (ablation)Local-DSM · CIFAR-10Gap between local-DSM and unbiased ISM BPDHurt
Replace ISM with local-DSM trainingScore model for non-equilibrium stochastic dynamics · Non-equilibrium stochastic dynamicsMMDHelped
Replace ISM with local-DSM trainingScore model for interacting particle systems · Interacting particle systemsSample variance fidelityHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 2D checkerboard non-equilibrium stochastic dynamics (nonlinear x,v system) interacting particle system (N=5)

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 2D checkerboard non-equilibrium stochastic dynamics interacting particle system

Metrics: bits per dim MMD sample variance

Baselines: ISM ELBO with Hutchinson trace estimator DSM with linear processes

Builds on: denoising score matching implicit score matching variational diffusion models

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy