atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Matrix and tensor methods

Operator SVD with Neural Networks via Nested Low-Rank Approximation

ICML 2024 · Learning theory and algorithms › Matrix and tensor methods · approach: Geometry of low-rank and SPD structure · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes NeuralSVD, which learns top-L singular functions of a linear operator by minimizing an unconstrained low-rank approximation (LoRA) objective with sequential or joint "nesting" to recover ordered singular functions.

Problem

Computing the leading eigenvalues/eigenfunctions or singular functions of high-dimensional linear operators (e.g., PDE eigenproblems, canonical dependence kernels) where matrix methods scale poorly and existing neural approaches (SpIN, NeuralEF) struggle with orthogonality and ordering.

Approach

Use Schmidt's low-rank approximation objective (unconstrained, unbiased gradients) and break the rotational symmetry with nesting, either sequential (disjoint networks, summing per-level objectives) or joint (weighted sum of nested objectives with masked gradients), so ordered singular functions are learned without explicit orthonormality constraints.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use NeuralSVD joint instead of IIAEZS-SBIR retrieval on Sketchy Extended · ZS-SBIR Sketchy Extended, split 1P@100: 0.659 -> ${\bf 0.670}_{\pm0.010}$Helped
Use NeuralSVD joint instead of IIAEZS-SBIR retrieval on Sketchy Extended · ZS-SBIR Sketchy Extended, split 1mAP: 0.573 -> ${\bf 0.581}_{\pm0.008}$Helped
Add nesting to the LoRA objective (ablation)NeuralSVD on the 2D hydrogen atom · 2D hydrogen atom, 16 eigenmodessubspace distance: 3.56\times 10^{-4}${ ${\pm 6.60\times 10^{-5}}$} -> 2.12\times 10^{-4}${ ${\pm 2.09\times 10^{-5}}$}Helped
Add nesting to the LoRA objective (ablation)NeuralSVD on the 2D hydrogen atom · 2D hydrogen atom, 16 eigenmodessubspace distance: 3.56\times 10^{-4}${ ${\pm 6.60\times 10^{-5}}$} -> 2.06\times 10^{-4}${ ${\pm 1.91\times 10^{-5}}$}Helped
Use joint rather than sequential nesting with a shared parameterization (ablation)NeuralSVD on the 2D hydrogen atom · 2D hydrogen atomeigenfunction fidelityHurt
Use sequential rather than joint nesting with a shared parameterization (ablation)NeuralSVD for ZS-SBIR retrieval · ZS-SBIR Sketchy ExtendedP@100: around 0.2Hurt
Use the most significant modes instead of the least significant modes (ablation)NeuralSVD retrieval representations · ZS-SBIR Sketchy Extendedretrieval performanceHelped
Remove nesting from the LoRA objective (ablation)NeuralSVD retrieval representations · ZS-SBIR Sketchy Extendedretrieval performanceMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Sketchy Extended

Benchmarks: Sketchy Extended ZS-SBIR 2D hydrogen atom TISE 2D harmonic oscillator TISE

Metrics: P@100 mAP eigenfunction subspace distance eigenvalue error

Baselines: SpIN NeuralEF LOBPCG LCALE IIAE LoRA without nesting

Builds on: SpIN NeuralEF EigenGame Matryoshka Representation Learning

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy