atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Domain adaptation and generalization

Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Anatomical Structure Detection in Ultrasound Images

ICML 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Domain adaptation and generalization · approach: Geometric alignment and synthetic-to-real adaptation

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes ToMo-UDA, an unsupervised domain adaptation detector for fetal heart and head anatomical structures using topology and morphology knowledge transfer, and releases the multi-center FUSH2 ultrasound benchmark.

Problem

Cross-institution domain shift degrades anatomical structure detection in fetal ultrasound, where structures are dense and overlapping and target annotations are costly.

Approach

Exploits consistent anatomical topology (relative positions of substructures) and morphology (per-substructure appearance) across domains: a GNN over substructure centroids aligned by optimal transport (TKT), plus morph-aware GNN node alignment with a numerical-equilibrium step on feature statistics (MKT).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add TKT and MKT for domain adaptationSource Only · FUSH2 heart, Center 1→2mAP: +27.43% mAPHelped
add TKT and MKT for domain adaptationSource Only · FUSH2 head, Center 1→2mAP: +19.72% mAPHelped
add TKT (ablation)ToMo-UDA · FUSH2 heart, Center 1→2mAP: +14.70%Helped
add TKT (ablation)ToMo-UDA · FUSH2 heart, Center 2→1mAP: +7.74%Helped
add TKT (ablation)ToMo-UDA · FUSH2 head, Center 1→2mAP: +15.58%Helped
add MKT (ablation)ToMo-UDA · FUSH2 head, Center 1→2mAPHelped
add numerical equilibrium to TKT + MKT (ablation)ToMo-UDA without numerical equilibrium · FUSH2 heart, Center 1→2mAP: 68.97 -> 71.33Helped
add numerical equilibrium to TKT + MKT (ablation)ToMo-UDA without numerical equilibrium · FUSH2 head, Center 1→2mAP: 78.96 -> 81.30Helped
add numerical equilibrium to TKT + MKT (ablation)ToMo-UDA without numerical equilibrium · FUSH2 heart, Center 2→1mAP: 86.66 -> 88.71Helped
add numerical equilibrium to TKT + MKT (ablation)ToMo-UDA without numerical equilibrium · FUSH2 head, Center 2→1mAP: 67.56 -> 70.27Helped
use TKT and MKT instead of Source OnlySource Only · CardiacUDA, Site R→Site GmAP: 85.12 on LV and 83.83 on RV; 85.38 on LA and 86.53 on RAMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: FUSH2 MMWHS CardiacUDA

Benchmarks: FUSH2 MMWHS CardiacUDA

Metrics: mAP@0.5

Baselines: Source Only AcroFOD AsyFOD ConfMix SIGMA LRA CMT SIGMA++ AT

Builds on: FCOS Feature Pyramid Network Sinkhorn optimal transport GCN

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy