atlas

Research map / Image generation / Image restoration

The Perception-Robustness Tradeoff in Deterministic Image Restoration

ICML 2024 · Image generation › Image restoration · approach: Efficient restoration architectures · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proves that deterministic estimators with high joint perceptual quality (small Wasserstein distance between joint distributions of estimate and measurement) must have large Lipschitz constants, and validates this on GAN-based super-resolution models.

Problem

Deterministic image restoration methods are often trained to achieve both high perceptual quality and consistency with measurements, but it is unclear what this implies about their stability. The paper asks whether such estimators must be erratic (high Lipschitz constant) under non-invertible degrad

Approach

Shows that the joint perceptual index (Wasserstein distance between p_{X,Y} and p_{X_hat,Y}) lower-bounds the Lipschitz constant of any deterministic estimator as Lip >= m1/sqrt(W) - m2 for non-invertible degradations, independent of degradation type, architecture, or data distribution.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Reduce the robustness-loss coefficient λ in the CGAN denoiser objective (ablation)Toy-example deterministic CGAN denoiser · Gaussian denoising toy exampleaverage Lipschitz lower bound K̄Mixed
Reduce the joint perceptual indexDeterministic image super-resolution algorithms · DIV2K test set with Track1, Track2, and 4× bicubic degradationsaverage Lipschitz lower bound K̄Hurt
Perturb the degraded input with an attack targeting the female classGFPGAN v1.3 · CelebA-HQ gender classificationfemale-classified images: 63.3% -> 72.2%Helped
Perturb the degraded input with an attack targeting the female classRRDB · CelebA-HQ gender classificationfemale-classified images: 59.1% -> 56.9%Hurt
Use an L1-trained RRDB model instead of GFPGAN for the targeted attackFace-restoration decision pipeline · CelebA-HQ gender classificationvulnerability to targeted attackHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: DIV2K CelebA-HQ

Benchmarks: DIV2K test set with Track1 and Track2 degradations and 4x bicubic

Metrics: Lipschitz constant lower bound (average K via I-FGSM) Joint-FID Joint-EMD RMSE FID KID precision and recall

Baselines: RealESRGAN BSRGAN BSRNet FeMaSR DAN ESRGAN RRDB SwinIR-GAN

Builds on: conditional GAN I-FGSM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy