atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Differential privacy

Privacy Profiles for Private Selection

ICML 2024 · Federated learning and privacy › Differential privacy · approach: Private data analysis frameworks · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Derives (epsilon,delta) privacy-profile bounds for private selection (ReportNoisyMax and randomized-count tuning) from the privacy profiles of base mechanisms, giving tighter accounting than RDP for DP-SGD tuning and generalized PTR.

Problem

Private selection (Report Noisy Max, Sparse Vector, private hyperparameter tuning) is analyzed mainly via RDP, which is lossy when (epsilon,delta)-DP is needed; there are no bounds that use base mechanisms' privacy profiles directly.

Approach

Bound the hockey-stick divergence of the best-of-K selection output using the base mechanism's privacy profile and the probability generating function of the random number of runs K; this yields point-wise (epsilon,delta) bounds for truncated negative binomial and binomial distributions of K, and also allows tuning of privacy-affecting hyperparameters.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use privacy-profile accounting instead of RDP accountingPrivate hyperparameter tuning of DP-SGD · DP-SGD tuning, q=16384/50000, σ=21.1, T=250candidate models evaluated: approximately 3 times as many modelsHelped
Tune σ using geometrically distributed KPoisson-subsampled Gaussian mechanism · DP-SGD tuning, q=0.01, σ=2.0, 3.0, and 4.0iterations: ≈ 4000, 10000 and 18000 iterationsHelped
Use the privacy-profile bound rather than RDP accountingPrivate selection with a binomial number of runs · Gaussian mechanism, sensitivity 1, σ=4.0, m=10concentration of K at δ ≈ 10^-6: δ ≈ 10^{-6}Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: UCI benchmark datasets (linear regression)

Benchmarks: UCI linear regression (two datasets)

Metrics: epsilon-delta privacy bound privacy-utility trade-off number of evaluable models

Baselines: RDP-based private selection bounds Poisson-distributed K RDP bound OPS-Balanced output perturbation 3-epsilon pure DP selection bound

Builds on: Renyi differential privacy Liu and Talwar private selection Papernot and Steinke private selection Generalized Propose-Test-Release DP-SGD

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy