atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Offline RL

Hybrid Reinforcement Learning from Offline Observation Alone

ICML 2024 · Reinforcement learning › Offline RL · approach: Offline-to-online fine-tuning · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes FOOBAR, a forward-backward hybrid RL algorithm that learns from observation-only offline state data using only trace-model access, matching reset-model performance under an admissibility assumption.

Problem

Hybrid RL where offline data contains only states (observation-only), and the online environment offers only a trace model (reset to initial state) rather than a reset-to-any-state simulator.

Approach

Use forward state-moment-matching (FAIL-style adversarial imitation with a discriminator class built from the value function class) to learn a roll-in policy that matches the offline state distribution, then run PSDP backward with this roll-in as a surrogate reset model; under admissibility, this matches reset-model sample complexity.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use Foobar with benign inadmissible offline data instead of the forward pass aloneFoobar · Combination lock, benign inadmissible datarelative success rate: $0.12~(0.1,0.135)$ -> $1~(1,1)$Helped
use Foobar rather than the forward pass aloneFoobar · Combination lock, adversarial inadmissible datarelative success rate: $0~(0,0)$ -> $0~(0,0)$No clear effect
use Foobar rather than PSDP with reset accessCombination lock · Combination lock, benign inadmissible datarelative success rate: $1~(1,1)$ -> $1~(1,1)$No clear effect
use Foobar rather than PSDP with reset accessCombination lock · Combination lock, adversarial inadmissible datarelative success rate: $1.1~(0.95,1.15)$ -> $0~(0,0)$Hurt
use Foobar rather than pure online RLHybrid RL on combination lock · Combination locksample efficiencyHelped
use Foobar rather than canonical hybrid Q-LearningHybrid RL on combination lock · Combination locksample efficiencyMixed
use Foobar rather than RLPDHybrid RL on hammer-binary · Hammer-binaryperformanceHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: D4RL hammer (binary reward) combination lock (epsilon-greedy pi* offline data)

Benchmarks: combination lock (H=100) hammer-binary (D4RL Adroit, H=50) inadmissible combination lock (H=10)

Metrics: evaluation return / success rate vs. sample count relative success rate over optimal policy

Baselines: HyQ BRIEE Online RL PSDP RLPD

Builds on: PSDP FAIL HyQ RLPD SAC

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy