atlas

Research map / Optimization / Implicit bias and generalization

Convex Relaxations of ReLU Neural Networks Approximate Global Optima in Polynomial Time

ICML 2024 · Optimization › Implicit bias and generalization · approach: Shallow ReLU network convergence · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows that the Gaussian (randomly sampled hyperplane arrangement) convex relaxation of regularized two-layer ReLU training is within an O(√log n) factor of the original non-convex optimum for random data, yielding a polynomial-time approximation algorithm and guarantees for local gradient methods.

Problem

Training two-layer ReLU networks with weight decay is NP-hard, and the optimality gap between the randomized convex relaxation (Gaussian sampling of hyperplane arrangement patterns) and the original non-convex problem was unknown.

Approach

Under i.i.d. Gaussian data with n/d constant, bounds the relative optimality gap of the Gaussian-sampled convex relaxation by O(√log n) via a duality analysis for unconstrained group-l1 problems plus a Gordon-comparison bound on cone sharpness; combined with a coupling lemma, this extends to local gradient methods converging to stationary points with low loss.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace the full set of hyperplane arrangement patterns with randomly sampled patternsTwo-layer ReLU network convex reformulation · Gaussian random training data (A1)relative optimality approximation factor: C\sqrt{\log 2n}Helped
Solve the randomly relaxed convex problem using the polynomial-time algorithmTwo-layer ReLU network with weight decay · Gaussian random training data (A1)relative optimality bound: O(\sqrt{\log n})Helped
Use random initialization with a local gradient method under (A1) and (A2)Two-layer ReLU network with weight decay · Gaussian random training data (A1)relative training loss: C\sqrt{\log 2n}Helped
Use group l1 regularization rather than l2 regularization in the unconstrained relaxationUnconstrained Gaussian relaxation · Gaussian random training data (A1)relative optimality approximation factor: \frac{\sqrt{2\kappa}}{G}Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: synthetic i.i.d. Gaussian data MNIST

Metrics: relative optimality gap optimal value ratio

Baselines: exact convex reformulation (Pilanci & Ergen 2020) Gaussian relaxation (Ergen & Pilanci) l2-regularized convex approximation

Builds on: convex reformulation of ReLU networks Gaussian relaxation of hyperplane arrangements Gordon's comparison matrix Chernoff

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy