atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Variational and generative sampling

Identification and Estimation for Nonignorable Missing Data: A Data Fusion Approach

ICML 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Variational and generative sampling · approach: Likelihood-free and graphical model estimation · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a data-fusion approach that identifies the mean of an MNAR outcome in a primary domain by pooling it with an auxiliary MAR domain, giving two identification models and IPW estimators, illustrated on NYS COVID-19 hospitalization data.

Problem

Parameter identification and estimation when an outcome is missing not at random (MNAR) and cannot be identified from the MNAR data alone, without strong missing-data model assumptions.

Approach

Augment the MNAR primary dataset with an auxiliary MAR dataset via selection-at-random across domains; under two complementary sets of assumptions (Model 1: missingness depends on a potentially missing covariate; Model 2: missingness depends on the outcome, using a shadow-variable odds-ratio approach), the outcome mean becomes identified from pooled data, and an IPW estimator is derived.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the Model 1 IPW estimator instead of the MAR estimatorHospitalization-rate estimation for NYS March 2020 · COVID-19 NYS March 2020hospitalization rate estimate: 0.7337 -> 0.7396Mixed
Use the Model 2 IPW estimator instead of the MAR estimatorHospitalization-rate estimation for NYS March 2020 · COVID-19 NYS March 2020hospitalization rate estimate: 0.7337 -> 0.7836Mixed
Use the Model 1 IPW estimator instead of the MCAR estimatorHospitalization-rate estimation for NYS March 2020 · COVID-19 NYS March 2020hospitalization rate estimate: 0.7533 -> 0.7396Mixed
Use the Model 2 IPW estimator instead of the MCAR estimatorHospitalization-rate estimation for NYS March 2020 · COVID-19 NYS March 2020hospitalization rate estimate: 0.7533 -> 0.7836Mixed
Use IPW rather than the MAR estimatorModel 1 simulation · Simulation study, Model 1biasHelped
Use IPW rather than the MAR estimatorModel 2 simulation · Simulation study, Model 2biasHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: COVID-19 Case Surveillance Public Use Data with Geography (New York State, March 2020 and March 2023) simulated data

Benchmarks: simulation study (n in 500, 1000, 2000; 1000 replicates) COVID-19 NYS hospitalization data

Metrics: bias bootstrap 95% confidence interval boxplot distribution of estimates

Baselines: MAR estimator MCAR estimator complete case analysis

Builds on: shadow variable approach data fusion directed acyclic graphs

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy