Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability
UniAudio: Towards Universal Audio Generation with Large Language Models
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes UniAudio, a ~1B-parameter LLM-based model trained on ~100k hours of public audio that unifies 11 audio generation tasks (speech, sound, music, singing) via discrete multimodal tokens and a hierarchical CodecFormer architecture.
Problem
Audio generation research is dominated by task-specific models with heavy domain knowledge; LLM-based audio models typically handle only one or a few tasks, and long RVQ-based audio token sequences make LLM modeling costly.
Approach
Tokenize all modalities (audio via a custom 3-RVQ codec, phonemes, MIDI, semantic tokens, T5 text embeddings) into one sequence format and model them with CodecFormer, a hierarchical patch predictor plus token predictor that treats each RVQ frame as a patch to avoid T×N sequence lengths while keeping flattened autoregression.
Key results
- On the 7 training-stage tasks, UniAudio beats the chosen prior work in 3 of 6 subjective comparisons and 5 of 7 objective comparisons, but underperforms on Text-to-Music versus Copet et al. (2023).
- After fine-tuning on 4 new tasks, UniAudio surpasses baselines on audio edit (FD 17.78 vs 20.78) and speech dereverberation (PESQ 2.13 vs 2.87 is lower, DNSMOS 3.51 vs 3.42 is higher), and approaches ground truth on prompt TTS.
- Ablation shows jointly trained UniAudio outperforms single-task models on all 11 tasks; CodecFormer matches naive flattening quality (MCD 6.52 vs 6.56) at lower training cost (19.4 GB vs 36.7 GB GPU memory).
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use UniAudio instead of Shen et al. (2023) | TTS · TTS | SIM: 0.62 -> 0.71 | Helped |
| Use UniAudio instead of Shen et al. (2023) | TTS · TTS | MOS: 3.83±0.10 -> 3.81±0.07 | Hurt |
| Use UniAudio instead of Wang et al. (2023f) | Voice Conversion · Voice Conversion | SIM: 0.82 -> 0.87 | Helped |
| Use UniAudio instead of Chen et al. (2022) | Speech Enhancement · Speech Enhancement | PESQ: 3.41 -> 2.63 | Hurt |
| Use UniAudio instead of Chen et al. (2022) | Speech Enhancement · Speech Enhancement | DNSMOS: 3.34 -> 3.66 | Helped |
| Use UniAudio instead of Žmolíková et al. (2019) | Target Speech Extraction · Target Speech Extraction | PESQ: 2.89 -> 1.88 | Hurt |
| Use UniAudio instead of Žmolíková et al. (2019) | Target Speech Extraction · Target Speech Extraction | DNSMOS: 3.18 -> 3.96 | Helped |
| Use UniAudio instead of Liu et al. (2022) | Singing Voice Synthesis · Singing Voice Synthesis | MOS: 3.94±0.02 -> 4.08±0.04 | Helped |
| Use UniAudio instead of Ghosal et al. (2023) | Text-to-Sound · Text-to-Sound | OVL: 66.2±1.7 -> 61.9±1.9 | Hurt |
| Use UniAudio instead of Copet et al. (2023) | Text-to-Music · Text-to-Music | FAD: 4.52 -> 3.65 | Helped |
| Fine-tune UniAudio for Audio Edit instead of using AUDIT | Audio Edit · Audio Edit | FD: 20.78 -> 17.78 | Helped |
| Add sound and speech data to music training (ablation) | UniAudio text-to-music · Text-to-Music | OVL: 64.4±2.1 -> 67.9±1.8 | Helped |
Surprising findings
- Adding out-of-domain sound and speech data improved text-to-music generation over music-only training.
- Signal-level metrics such as PESQ and VISQOL may not be suitable for LLM-based generative methods, so UniAudio looks weaker on them despite competitive subjective scores.
Limitations
- UniAudio underperforms the selected competitor on Text-to-Music, which the authors attribute to that competitor using more private labeled data.
- Signal-level metrics show weaker results on several tasks, and the authors note these may not suit LLM-based generation.
- Fine-tuned tasks have less data, and the model's performance on them is less competitive on some metrics such as SE and TSE subjective scores.
Experimental setup
Datasets: LibriTTS Million Song Dataset m4singer musiccaps VCTK clotho
Benchmarks: LibriTTS Million Song Dataset VCTK musiccaps m4singer
Metrics: WER SIM PESQ VISQOL DNSMOS MCD FAD KL FD MOS
Baselines: Shen et al. (2023) Wang et al. (2023f) Chen et al. (2022) Žmolíková et al. (2019) Liu et al. (2022) Ghosal et al. (2023) Copet et al. (2023) SGMSE+ AUDIT Encodec DAC
Builds on: SPEAR TTS VALL-E MusicGen Encodec DAC
Closest papers by meaning
- Unified Synthesis of Compositional Speech and Sound from Free-Form Text Prompts (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.90)
- UniFlow-Audio: Unified Flow Matching for Audio Generation from Omni-Modalities (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.89)
- AudioGenX: Explainability on Text-to-Audio Generative Models (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.89)
- AudioCALM: Continuous Autoregressive Language Modeling for Universal Audio Generation (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.89)
- A Unified Audio Language Model with Text-Aligned Factorized Audio Tokenization (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.88)
- UALM: Unified Audio Language Model for Understanding, Generation and Reasoning (ICLR 2026 · similarity 0.88)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
