atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Re-Dock: Towards Flexible and Realistic Molecular Docking with Diffusion Bridge

ICML 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Protein interface and docking prediction · 6 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Re-Dock introduces flexible docking (ligand plus pocket sidechain poses) and a geometric diffusion bridge model with Newton-Euler energy-to-geometry mapping that co-models binding energy and poses.

Problem

Molecular docking that relies on holo protein structures leaks information and ignores pocket sidechain flexibility, producing unrealistic poses with steric clashes; realistic flexible docking (apo and cross-dock) remains under-addressed.

Approach

Extends diffusion bridges to geometric manifolds (translation, SO(3) rotation, torsion angles) and injects interaction-energy priors via a Newton-Euler-inspired energy-to-geometry mapping, with autoregressive sidechain torsion generation and a learnable energy head to co-model energy and poses.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add sidechain torsion sampling at inference (ablation)Re-Dock · PDBBind test, flexible redocking%<2 Top-1 RMSD: 39.8 -> 53.9Helped
add sidechain torsion sampling at inference (ablation)Re-Dock · PDBBind test, flexible redockingMed. Top-1 RMSD: 3.3 -> 1.8Helped
add prior energy drift during training (ablation)Re-Dock · PDBBind test, flexible redocking%<2 Top-1 RMSD: 50.3 -> 53.9Helped
add prior energy drift during training (ablation)Re-Dock · PDBBind test, flexible redockingMed. Top-1 RMSD: 2.4 -> 1.8Helped
use learned prior bridge rather than classifier-guided sampling (ablation)Re-Dock vs DiffDock (pocket) · PDBBind test, flexible redocking%<2 Top-1 RMSD: 52.7 -> 53.9Helped
reduce sampling steps to 10 (ablation)Re-Dock · PDBBind test, flexible redocking%<2 Top-1 RMSD: 53.9 -> 52.1Hurt
reduce sampling steps to 10 (ablation)Re-Dock · PDBBind test, flexible redockingMed. Top-1 RMSD: 1.8 -> 2.0Hurt
use Re-Dock instead of DiffDock (pocket)PDBBind test holo crystal docking · PDBBind test, holo crystal, Top-1 RMSD%<2: 51.8 -> 53.9Helped
use Re-Dock instead of DiffDock (pocket)PDBBind test apo ESMFold docking · PDBBind test, apo ESMFold, Top-1 RMSD%<2: 37.8 -> 42.9Helped
use Re-Dock instead of SMINA-FlexCrossDock · CrossDock, Top-5 RMSD%<2: 26.2 -> 36.1Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: PDBBind v2020 PoseBusters DUD-E ESMFold predicted apo structures PDB apo structures

Benchmarks: PDBBind test (flexible redocking) ESMFold apo structures apo crystal structures cross-dock (7 DUD-E targets) PoseBusters

Metrics: top-1 RMSD < 2 percent top-1 RMSD < 5 percent median RMSD top-5 RMSD SC-RMSD average runtime PB-Valid pass rate

Baselines: SMINA GNINA LeDock SurfLex QVina GNINA-Flex SMINA-Flex FlexPose DiffDock

Builds on: DiffDock diffusion bridge (prior bridge) Brownian bridge Amber force field

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy