atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Weakly supervised detection and segmentation

Scribble-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Prototype-based Feature Augmentation

ICML 2024 · Detection and segmentation › Weakly supervised detection and segmentation · approach: Weakly supervised semantic segmentation

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes prototype-based feature augmentation (local and global feature prototypes from high-confidence pixels) for scribble-supervised semantic segmentation, reaching 77.9% mIoU on PASCAL VOC 2012 with MiT-B1.

Problem

Scribble-supervised semantic segmentation propagates sparse scribble labels to unlabeled pixels, but existing methods ignore features of already correctly classified pixels during propagation.

Approach

Extract class prototypes from high-confidence pixel features of the current image (local) and maintain a memory bank of multiple prototypes per class (global), then use attention-based prototype feature augmenters with a consistency loss between original and augmented predictions, adapting FeatMatch-style augmentation from image-level/semi-supervised settings to pixel-level scribble supervision.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add local prototype augmentation (consistency loss) to partial CE baseline (ablation)MiT-B1 scribble segmentation · PASCAL VOC 2012 valmIoU: +9.4 mIoU (67.5 to 76.9)Helped
add global prototype augmentation (consistency loss) to partial CE baseline (ablation)MiT-B1 scribble segmentation · PASCAL VOC 2012 valmIoU: +9.9 mIoU (67.5 to 77.4)Helped
combine local and global prototype augmentation (ablation)MiT-B1 scribble segmentation · PASCAL VOC 2012 valmIoU: +10.4 mIoU over baseline; +0.5 over global onlyHelped
use global-prototype-augmented prediction under partial CE vs other loss choice (ablation)two-prototype variant · PASCAL VOC 2012 valmIoUNo clear effect
proposed method vs TEL state of the art on scribble supervision with comparable backboneMiT-B1 · PASCAL VOC 2012 valmIoU: +0.6 (77.3 to 77.9)Helped
increase number of global prototypes per class (ablation)global prototype augmentation only · PASCAL VOC 2012 valmIoU: gains saturate around 5 prototypes per classHelped
top-k percentage for prototype extraction set to 8% vs other values (ablation)local prototype augmentation · PASCAL VOC 2012 valmIoUMixed
scale backbone from MiT-B1 to MiT-B5 or MiT-B3 under scribble supervision (ablation)Segformer with proposed method · PASCAL VOC 2012 valmIoU: MiT-B3 79.8, MiT-B5 81.5 vs MiT-B1 77.9Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: PASCAL-Scribble PASCAL VOC 2012 ImageNet

Benchmarks: PASCAL VOC 2012

Metrics: mIoU

Baselines: TEL AGMM CDSP URSS A2GNN SPML BPG GatedCRF

Builds on: FeatMatch SegFormer ScribbleSup

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy