atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Equivariant Frames and the Impossibility of Continuous Canonicalization

ICML 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Equivariant and disentangled latent representations · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows continuous canonicalization and unweighted frames are impossible for S_n, SO(d), O(d) on point clouds, and introduces weighted "robust frames" that always preserve continuity, with constructions of moderate size.

Problem

Canonicalization and frame-averaging for enforcing group invariance/equivariance often destroy continuity of the input function, causing lack of robustness; existing frames are large (e.g., n! for permutations).

Approach

Proves topological impossibility results (fundamental group, homology, Borsuk-Ulam) for continuous canonicalization and continuity-preserving unweighted frames, then defines weighted, weakly equivariant, continuous "robust frames" whose invariant projections always preserve continuity, and constructs polynomial-size robust frames for S_n, SO(d), O(d).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Enforce permutation invariance with robust frames instead of discontinuous x-axis sortingMLP on MNIST point clouds · MNIST point-cloud classification, testaccuracy (%): 85.6 -> 75.5 / 85.6 / 87.1 / 88.4; 85.6 -> 74.2 / 85.9 / 87.6 / 88.7Mixed
Enforce permutation invariance with sampled Reynolds averaging rather than no invarianceMLP on MNIST point clouds · MNIST point-cloud classification, testaccuracy (%): 25.5 -> 21.0 / 22.4 / 22.6 / 22.6Hurt
Increase inference samples for robust framesRobust Frames (Sec. 4.1 and Sec. 4.2) on the MLP · MNIST point-cloud classification, testaccuracy (%): 75.5 / 85.6 / 87.1 / 88.4; 74.2 / 85.9 / 87.6 / 88.7Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MNIST

Benchmarks: MNIST point-cloud classification (2D, 100 points)

Metrics: test accuracy (%)

Baselines: discontinuous canonicalization (sorting along x-axis) Reynolds operator no invariance

Builds on: frame averaging canonicalization group averaging (Reynolds operator)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy