atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

How Flawed Is ECE? An Analysis via Logit Smoothing

ICML 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Recognition and long-tail · approach: Confidence calibration objectives · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Characterizes the discontinuities of expected calibration error (ECE) for general distributions and proposes Logit-Smoothed ECE (LS-ECE), a continuous, consistently estimable variant that closely tracks binned ECE on CIFAR and ImageNet classifiers.

Problem

ECE is discontinuous as a function of the predictor and hard to estimate consistently from samples (binned variants are sensitive to bin width), raising the question of whether these pathologies matter for real calibration measurement.

Approach

Characterize exactly where ECE is discontinuous (discrete and general Polish-space settings), then add independent continuous Gaussian noise to the predictor's logit before computing ECE. This yields a continuous functional in L-infinity that admits a kernel-style consistent estimator, and is shown empirically to track binned ECE.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add continuous logit noise before computing calibration errorECE · Any data distributioncontinuityHelped
Use binned ECE while varying the number of binsSynthetic 2-point distribution · 2-point distributionECE: ≈ 0 and ≈ 1/2Mixed
Use logit-smoothed ECE instead of binned ECE across bin counts and corresponding noise variancesPretrained CIFAR classifiers · CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 test datacalibration errorNo clear effect
Use logit-smoothed ECE instead of binned ECE across bin counts and noise variancesPretrained image-classification models · ImageNet-1K-valcalibration errorNo clear effect
Replace Gaussian noise with uniform noise (ablation)LS-ECE · CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet experimentscalibration error comparison with ECENo clear effect
Vary the number of bins used for binned ECESynthetic 2-point distribution · 2-point distributionLS-ECENo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 ImageNet-1K validation

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 ImageNet-1K

Metrics: expected calibration error LS-ECE smECE

Baselines: binned ECE smECE

Builds on: expected calibration error smECE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy