atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Sample complexity

Constant Matters: Fine-grained Error Bound on Differentially Private Continual Observation

ICML 2023 · Learning theory and algorithms › Sample complexity · approach: Computational thresholds in graphs and structure

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Explicit lower-triangular factorization of M_count (Algorithm 1) instead of binary mechanismcontinual binary counting · continual counting, T up to 244cb-norm upper bound: ≈0.35 improvement over Mathias bound for 50≤T≤244Helped
Use lower-triangular factorization so matrix mechanism works in continual release (output at t uses only first t rows)matrix mechanism for continual counting · continual countingvalidity of continual releaseHelped
Replace binary mechanism with the factorization mechanismbinary counting l_inf error · continual countingl_inf additive error: binary mechanism suboptimal by factor π log2(e)Helped
Smooth, monotone error (factorization) vs non-smooth binary mechanism errorcontinual counting output error · continual countingsmoothness of additive error over timeHelped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy