atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

Robustness Verification for Contrastive Learning

ICML 2022 · Adversarial robustness and security › Certified and empirical robustness · approach: Adversarial training with feature consistency

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use CBC (beta-CROWN for CL) instead of CROWN as the incomplete verifierRVCL certified instance accuracy · CIFAR-10 CNN-Bcertified instance accuracy: 55% vs 34% at eps_test=4/255Helped
Use CBC instead of CROWN as the incomplete verifierRVCL verified lower bound tightness · MNIST and CIFAR-10gap to PGD upper boundHelped
Use CBC instead of CROWN for ACR computation (ablation)ACR_CL computation · MNIST and CIFAR-10ACR_CL valueNo clear effect
Increase contrastive adversarial training strength eps_trainCL encoder trained with RoCL · MNIST and CIFAR-10ACR_CL and ACR_LEHelped
Increase feature dimension of encoder output (ablation)CL encoder · CIFAR-10 CNN-BACR_CLNo clear effect
Increase number of negative samples K (ablation)ACR_CL estimation · CIFAR-10 CNN-BACR_CLNo clear effect

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy