atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

Probabilistically Robust Learning: Balancing Average and Worst-case Performance

ICML 2022 · Adversarial robustness and security › Certified and empirical robustness · approach: Provable robust learning guarantees · 6 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
replace adversarial/ERM training with probabilistically robust learning (PRL, CVaR-based)ResNet-18 · CIFAR-10ProbAcc(0.01): about +6 points over best baseline (88.55 vs 82.90)Helped
PRL training instead of adversarial trainingResNet-18 · CIFAR-10Clean accuracy: 93.82 vs 84.38 for PGDHelped
PRL training instead of ERMResNet-18 · CIFAR-10Adversarial accuracy (PGD): 0.71 vs 1.25 for ERMHurt
PRL training instead of ERMResNet-18 · SVHNClean accuracy: 95.00 vs 94.44Helped
PRL training instead of DALEResNet-18 · SVHNProbAcc(0.01): 91.74 vs 89.19Helped
PRL training instead of PGD adversarial trainingCNN (4-layer) · MNISTProbAcc(0.01): 98.54 vs 98.34Helped
PRL training instead of PGD adversarial trainingCNN (4-layer) · MNISTAdversarial accuracy (PGD): 26.03 vs 94.45Hurt
lower rho (stricter robustness) in PRL (ablation)PRL · CIFAR-10, MNIST, SVHNadversarial accuracy vs clean accuracyMixed

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy